Machine Tool Spindle Temperature Control via Dynamic Coolant Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional temperature control systems for machine tools often result in thermal deformation due to fixed coolant temperature and flow rate, leading to prolonged warm-up times and reduced machining accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A temperature control system incorporating a cooling circulation with a pump, cooler, and solenoid valve, controlled by a variable frequency motor and a controller that detects spindle load, speed, and temperature, using regression equations and PID control to dynamically adjust coolant flow and temperature, preventing coolant backflow and optimizing spindle temperature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If fixed coolant temperature and flow rate are used, then the temperature control system is simple to operate, but thermal deformation occurs and machining accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidtemperature control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed coolant temperature and flow rate to dynamic adjustment based on real-time spindle load and temperature. The controller continuously monitors spindle parameters and adjusts coolant flow rate and temperature accordingly, making the temperature control system adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by enabling high machining accuracy through dynamic control while maintaining operational simplicity through automated feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by varying coolant temperature and flow rate as control parameters based on spindle operating conditions. The controller modifies these parameters in real-time according to spindle load and temperature measurements, allowing the system to optimize thermal management for different machining scenarios. This approach improves machining accuracy by preventing thermal deformation while managing system complexity through parameter-based control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If conventional temperature control systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but warm-up time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarm-up timeVSAvoidtemperature control system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing proactive temperature management that anticipates thermal conditions based on spindle load. The controller pre-adjusts coolant parameters before thermal deformation occurs, and the system activates cooling strategies based on predicted thermal trends rather than reacting to temperature deviations. This reduces warm-up time by preparing the thermal management system in advance while managing complexity through predictive control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring spindle temperature and load, then using this information to adjust coolant flow rate and temperature. The closed-loop control system compares actual temperature measurements with target values and modifies coolant parameters to maintain optimal thermal conditions. This feedback-driven approach accelerates warm-up by actively managing thermal transitions while managing system complexity through automated control loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If dynamic adjustment of coolant flow and temperature is implemented, then machining accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespindle temperature control precisionVSAvoidcoolant pump and cooler energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by adjusting coolant flow rate and temperature to match actual thermal demands rather than maintaining maximum cooling capacity continuously. The controller modulates coolant parameters proportionally to spindle load and temperature, applying only the necessary cooling effort for current operating conditions. This reduces energy consumption by avoiding excessive cooling while maintaining precise spindle temperature control through proportional adjustment of coolant flow and temperature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through cyclic monitoring and adjustment of coolant parameters based on varying spindle operating conditions. The controller continuously cycles through measurement and adjustment phases, adapting coolant flow and temperature to periodic variations in spindle load during machining operations. This periodic control strategy optimizes energy consumption by synchronizing cooling effort with actual thermal generation patterns while maintaining precise temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables faster thermal equilibrium, reduced thermal displacement, and improved machining accuracy by dynamically controlling coolant flow and temperature, while also being energy-efficient during loading/unloading processes.

Implementation Method 1

The pump is driven by a variable frequency motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The cooler is serially connected with the pump and may cool the liquid coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

The solenoid valve is connected to an inlet and an outlet of the cooler. When the solenoid valve is turned on, it prevents the liquid coolant flows through the spindle from flowing back to the cooler

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 4

the temperature control system covers most parts of the spindle with a cooling jacket and creates a liquid coolant circulation in the cooling jacket so as to control the temperature of the spindle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS10688615B2Temperature control system and method thereof
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 IND TECH RES INST
  • US10688615B2 patent drawing
  • US10688615B2 patent drawing
  • US10688615B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a temperature control system that may be applied to a machine tool. The system includes a cooling circulation and a controller. The cooling circulation comprises a pump, a cooler and a solenoid valve. The pump may be driven by a variable frequency motor so as to flow through the spindle of the machine tool. The cooler is serially connected with the liquid pump, and may cool the liquid coolant. The solenoid valve connects to inlet and outlet of the cooler, and may prevent the liquid coolant flows through the spindle from flowing back to the cooler. The controller is electrically connected with the variable frequency motor, the cooler and the solenoid valve. Further, the controller is connected to the machine tool to detect several parameters, so as to control the variable frequency motor, the cooler and the solenoid valve.