Spine-Leaf Network Spatial Computing Data Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to secure data transmission and protect data privacy in spatial computing devices, particularly in transactions involving banking applications, while ensuring the integrity and security of the data transmission pathway over a spine-leaf network.

Innovation Solution

The use of homomorphic encryption and serpent encryption algorithms to encrypt data sets into hash values, which are then compared for equivalence to validate the integrity of the data transmission pathway, ensuring secure end-to-end transmission over a spine-leaf network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cryptographic algorithms are used to encrypt data, then data privacy and security are improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The encryption process is divided into two distinct stages: a validation stage using homomorphic encryption to verify data integrity without decryption, and a transmission stage using serpent encryption for secure data transfer. This segmentation allows each algorithm to perform its specific function efficiently, reducing overall processing complexity while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The homomorphic encryption validation is performed in advance before the actual data transmission occurs. By pre-validing the data integrity and checking hash values match, the system ensures security is established before transmission begins, avoiding the need for complex real-time encryption-decryption operations during data transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If homomorphic encryption is used to validate data transmission pathway, then data integrity is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The homomorphic encryption validation is performed as a preliminary step before data transmission begins. The system pre-computes and compares hash values to validate the transmission pathway, ensuring integrity is established in advance rather than during the actual data transfer process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation function is extracted from the data transmission process itself and performed separately using homomorphic encryption. By taking out the validation operation and performing it in advance with encrypted data, the system verifies integrity without adding processing time to the actual data transfer operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If multiple encryption algorithms are applied to different data sets, then security validation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity validationVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security validation process is segmented into two distinct phases: validation phase using homomorphic encryption to verify data integrity and transmission pathway security, and transmission phase using serpent encryption for secure data transfer. Each algorithm operates independently on appropriately prepared data, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different encryption algorithms are applied to different data sets according to their specific requirements: homomorphic encryption is applied to validation data sets requiring integrity verification, while serpent encryption is applied to transmission data sets requiring secure transfer. This localized application of encryption algorithms optimizes security without unnecessarily increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250337588A1Secure validation of spatial computing data transmitted over spine-leaf network using homomorphic serpent cryptographic algorithm
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250337588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250337588A1 patent drawing
  • US20250337588A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for validating a data transmission pathway between two organizations across a spine-leaf network may use two cryptographic algorithms to validate the pathway. Data used to validate the pathway may include spatial computing telemetry. Once validated, sensitive data may be transmitted over the pathway. The spine-leaf network may receive one hash value encrypted by a homomorphic encryption algorithm run by an organization and another hash value encrypted by a serpent encryption algorithm run by a separate organization. A processor running in the spine-leaf network may validate an integrity of the data transmission pathway by comparing the two hash values to see if they are equivalent. When the hash values are equivalent, the pathway may be validated, and the sensitive data may be transmitted between the two organizations. The sensitive data may be transmitted as ciphertext. The sensitive data may include spatial computing telemetry.