Lateral Spine Stabilizer with Rotating Guide Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spine stabilization methods either lead to degeneration of adjacent disks, fail to provide dynamic stabilization, or are difficult to dimension correctly for individual patient anatomy, resulting in inadequate kinematic behavior and potential aggravation of spinal damage.

Innovation Solution

A device for lateral stabilization of the spine that replicates anatomical movements by using vertebral elements with guide surfaces that slide and rotate about a center located in the intervertebral disk space, allowing for precise kinematic behavior and stable stress distribution, while being easily implantable with lateral anchoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If rigid vertebral assemblies are implanted to permanently block articulating joints for arthrodesis, then vertebral stabilization is achieved, but adjacent disks degenerate and require subsequent operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebral stabilizationVSAvoidadjacent disk degeneration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic stabilization device with movable joints that replicate physiological spinal movements. The vertebral elements are connected by joints allowing relative movement, enabling the spine to maintain mobility while providing stabilization. This dynamic approach prevents the complete immobilization that causes adjacent disk degeneration in rigid fusion constructs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device divides the spinal stabilization function into multiple independent vertebral elements connected by joints. Rather than a single rigid assembly fusing multiple vertebrae, the segmented design allows each vertebra to maintain its articulation while providing stabilization through the connected elements, thereby preserving adjacent disk function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate vertebral elements connected by rectilinear telescopic joints are used, then the assembly adapts to kinematic development, but actual dynamic stabilization is not provided and intervertebral disks are not protected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekinematic adaptationVSAvoiddynamic stabilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements true dynamic stabilization through joints that allow controlled relative movement between vertebral elements. Unlike telescopic joints that only provide linear adjustment, the disclosed joints enable rotational and multi-axis movements that actively stabilize vertebrae while protecting intervertebral disks during physiological motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If pistons with elliptical cross-sections are used to connect vertebrae, then rotation about vertical axis is prevented, but articulating movements are centered behind the vertebrae causing disk pinching and crushing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational controlVSAvoiddisk pinching and crushing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the center of rotation from a position behind the vertebrae to the intervertebral disk space by redesigning the joint geometry. The guide surfaces and articulating structures are configured to establish rotation centers within the disk space, eliminating the pinching and crushing effects caused by posteriorly-centered rotation in piston designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If lateral dynamic stabilization devices with flexible joining elements are used, then spine mobility is retained and intervertebral disks are relieved, but dimensioning of flexibility is difficult and resilient behavior changes over time leading to poor stabilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespine mobility retentionVSAvoidstabilization consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible joining elements with carefully controlled mechanical parameters. The flexibility, stiffness, and resilient properties of these elements are specifically designed to maintain consistent stabilization performance over time while preserving spine mobility. The parameters are optimized to prevent the degradation issues seen in conventional flexible devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8246653B2Device for the lateral stabilization of the spine
Publication Date: 2012.08.21 CLARIANCE SAS
  • US8246653B2 patent drawing
  • US8246653B2 patent drawing
  • US8246653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The device (9) comprises vertebral elements (10, 20, 10′, 20′) adapted to be fixed to the same lateral side of the bodies of at least two adjacent vertebrae (1, 2), the elements being associated in pairs that are provided to be associated with the left and right sides of the vertebrae. In order to guide the vertebrae effectively and stably, in order, in use, to reproduce an articulating intervertebral joint, the two elements of each pair delimit respective surfaces (15, 25, 15′, 25′) for the relative guiding of those elements, which surfaces are adapted, when the elements are implanted on their corresponding vertebra, to extend generally along the same lateral side of the body of the vertebrae and to rest and slide one against the other in such a manner that the surfaces define a center of rotation (C) about which the two elements are able to turn one relative to the other.