Spinnable Spectacle Frames with Ball and Socket Joint
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional eyeglass frames are not designed to withstand the stress of spinning, which can cause strain on the frame structures and lenses, leading to potential damage.
Innovation Solution
Incorporating a spin joint in the temple arms that allows the frame and lenses to rotate freely around a spin axis, reducing stress on the frame and lenses, and using a ball and socket joint to secure the rotation without allowing the distal portion to pull away from the proximal portion.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If conventional eyeglass frames are used for spinning, then the frame structure and lenses are subjected to stress and potential damage, but the user wants to spin the eyeglasses
Solution Approach 1:
The temple arm is divided into two separate portions: a proximal portion that remains fixed to the frame and a distal portion that can rotate independently. This segmentation allows the user to spin the distal portion without transmitting stress to the frame or lenses, thereby enabling spinning capability while maintaining frame durability.
Solution Approach 2:
A rotation interface (ball and socket joint) is introduced as an intermediary mechanism between the proximal and distal portions of the temple arm. This intermediary allows controlled rotation of the distal portion while preventing stress transmission to the frame, resolving the contradiction between spinning ease and frame reliability.
2Ease of operation
If the temple arm is made rigid to prevent pulling away, then rotation is restricted, but the distal portion needs to rotate freely for spinning
Solution Approach 1:
The temple arm transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic articulated structure with a ball and socket joint. This allows the distal portion to rotate freely during spinning while the joint maintains structural integrity by preventing the distal portion from pulling away from the proximal portion.
Solution Approach 2:
The degree of freedom of the temple arm is changed by introducing a rotation interface. The proximal portion maintains fixed parameters (no rotation), while the distal portion gains rotational freedom, allowing the system to adapt between stability and rotation freedom as needed.
Data Source
AI summary
Spinnable frames for spectacles are provided. A spinnable frame allows a user to hold a distal end of one of the temples and freely spin the remainder of the spectacles around that end of the temple. A spin joint is provided in at least one of the temples that allows this spinning action. The spin joint may span an interface between the distal end of the temple and a proximal end of the temple, the proximal end being coupled to a front portion of the frame at a hinge interface. In this way, the temple arm is allowed to fold against the front portion for compact storage, as with conventional eyeglass frames, while facilitating spinning of the spectacles in a way that avoids excess forces on the hinge interface and/or other portions of the frame or lenses mounted therein.


