Spinning Process Foreign Material Detection and Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinning processes face challenges in optimizing yarn quality and reducing production costs due to foreign materials, which cause yarn breaks and affect the final textile product's appearance, leading to increased waste and frequent machine stops.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that assign foreign material information from two different positions in the spinning process to each other, allowing for adjustments to be made to the spinning process based on this information to optimize yarn quality and reduce waste, involving monitoring devices at early and downstream stages to determine and manage foreign material fractions and adjust removal and clearing criteria accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If foreign materials are removed more aggressively at the first position, then yarn quality improves, but fiber material waste increases and production costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn qualityVSAvoidfiber material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the second monitoring device (downstream) to adjust the removal criterion of the first monitoring device (upstream). The control unit compares foreign material detection results from both positions and dynamically modifies the threshold for foreign material removal at the first position, optimizing the balance between yarn quality and fiber waste reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary removal of foreign materials at the first position using a dynamically adjusted criterion. By optimizing the removal threshold based on downstream feedback, the system removes harmful foreign materials while preserving valuable fiber material that would otherwise be wasted, thus improving yarn quality without proportionally increasing waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If monitoring and removal operations are increased, then yarn quality improves, but production time is lost and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn qualityVSAvoidproduction output
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit uses feedback from downstream monitoring to adjust upstream removal criteria, enabling optimized real-time control that maintains high yarn quality while minimizing interruptions to the spinning process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The removal criterion is made dynamic rather than static. The control unit continuously adjusts the foreign material removal threshold at the first position based on real-time feedback from the second monitoring device, allowing the system to adapt to varying material conditions and optimize both quality and productivity dynamically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of substance

If foreign material detection and process adjustments are implemented, then production costs are reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction costsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it receives data from both monitoring devices, processes the information, determines the removal criterion dynamically, and controls the first monitoring device. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated unit, reducing overall system complexity while achieving cost reduction through optimized foreign material management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in higher yarn quality with fewer foreign materials and reduced waste, thereby optimizing productivity and costs by minimizing fiber material rejection and machine stoppages.

Implementation Method 1

The sensor optically scans the yarn by incident light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a compressed air pulse directed transversely to the fiber transport line through a removal opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressed air flow: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS12043926B2Optimizing a spinning process with respect to foreign materials
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 USTER TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US12043926B2 patent drawing
  • US12043926B2 patent drawing
  • US12043926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for optimizing a spinning process, through which a fiber material fed in the form of raw fibers and output in the form of yarn passes, with respect to foreign materials. At a first position in the spinning process, a first foreign material information relating to the foreign materials is determined. At a second position in the spinning process, which is downstream with respect to the first position, a second foreign material information relating to the foreign materials is determined. The first foreign material information and the second foreign material information are associated with each other such that they relate to substantially the same sample of the fiber material. Based on the first foreign material information and the second foreign material information assigned thereto, a change is made to the spinning process to optimize the spinning process.