Motion-Controlled Spinning Top With Counter-Rotor Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotating toys and novelty items struggle with maintaining stability and control, particularly in terms of rotational direction and horizontal movement, due to inherent counterrotation and lack of effective counteracting mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a counter-rotor system, typically comprising a centrifugal fan or offset mass, counteracts the undesirable counterrotation, allowing for rotational stability and controlled horizontal movement through a combination of gyroscopic effects and controlled mass displacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a conventional spinning top is set into rotation, then it rotates freely, but it experiences undesirable counterrotation and lacks stability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidcounterrotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by introducing a counter-rotor that rotates in the opposite direction to the main rotor. This counter-rotor generates a counter-torque that pre-compensates for and cancels out the undesirable counterrotation effects, allowing the spinning top to maintain rotational stability without the harmful counterrotational movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs the anti-weight principle by using a counter-rotor as a counterbalancing element. The counter-rotor acts as a rotational counterweight that offsets the destabilizing counterrotation forces, similar to how counterweights balance forces in mechanical systems, thereby achieving stable rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a spinning top is designed to allow horizontal movement, then it becomes more versatile, but it loses rotational control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal movement capabilityVSAvoidrotational direction control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by separating the control functions into independent components: the main rotor provides rotational motion, the counter-rotor maintains rotational stability and enables directional control, while the body's ability to tilt and precess enables horizontal movement. This functional segmentation allows both rotational control and horizontal mobility to coexist without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamics by allowing the body to dynamically adjust its orientation and tilt angle. The spinning top can lean and precess in response to gravitational forces and counter-torque, enabling controlled horizontal movement while the rotational control is maintained through the counter-rotor mechanism that adapts to the body's dynamic posture changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If a counter-rotor system is added to eliminate counterrotation, then rotational stability is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidnumber of rotating components
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies merging by combining multiple functions into the counter-rotor component. It not only counteracts the counterrotation to provide stability but also serves as a control mechanism for directing horizontal movement. By merging these functions into a single integrated component rather than adding separate systems, the patent reduces overall device complexity while achieving rotational stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables stable, controlled rotational direction and horizontal movement of the device, facilitating interactive play scenarios such as battles, racing, and obstacle courses, with the ability to return to a stationary state upon loss of user input.

Implementation Method 1

a counter-rotor arranged and configured to exert a counter-rotation in a second rotational direction, rotationally opposite the first direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-rotation: Angular Momentum

Implementation Method 2

allowing for rotational stability and controlled horizontal movement through a combination of gyroscopic effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic effect: Gyroscope

Implementation Method 3

controlled mass displacement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS20260048333A1Motion controlled spinning top
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ORBT PTY LTD
  • US20260048333A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048333A1 patent drawing
  • US20260048333A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-propelled and stabilized remote-controlled device is provided, that includes a spinning rotor and a separate platform above the spinning rotor that is rotationally stabilized to provide the device with an evident orientation to the user on which to base controlled movement. The device is suitable for use as a toy or similar novelty and suited for use in battle-type games between devices of a similar type.