Mechanical Spinning Toy With Stopper Head Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing toys often rely on electronic components, making them costly and vulnerable to damage or loss, with no new mechanical spinning toy designs emerging in recent years to offer a sturdy and engaging alternative.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical spinning toy with a rectangular body, cylindrical handles for rotation, and a stopper head mechanism that allows for continuous 360° arc swinging, manufactured from durable materials like hardwood, fiberglass, and aluminum alloy, testing user reflexes and coordination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If electronic components are used in toys, then functionality and engagement are improved, but cost and vulnerability to damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:

ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidvulnerability to damage

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic components with a purely mechanical system. The spinning motion is achieved through mechanical means involving the interaction between the swing, handles, and stopper head, eliminating the need for motors, batteries, or circuit boards while maintaining engaging functionality.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs simple, inexpensive mechanical parts that can be easily manufactured from durable materials like hardwood, fiberglass, or aluminum alloy. These components are designed to be robust and long-lasting, contrasting with expensive electronic toys that are vulnerable to damage.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If electronic components are used in toys, then engagement is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveengagementVSAvoidcost

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates electronic components entirely, using only simple mechanical parts that are inexpensive to manufacture. The engaging spinning action is achieved through the mechanical interaction of the swing, handles, and stopper head mechanism, which can be produced from common materials like hardwood, fiberglass, or aluminum alloy.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of manufacture

If mechanical spinning toy design is simplified, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but engagement and play value decrease

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidengagement

Core Design Contradiction:

Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the toy into distinct functional segments: the rectangular body, the swing with arms and plate, the cylindrical handles, and the stopper head mechanism. This segmentation allows for simple manufacturing of individual components while maintaining the complex, engaging spinning motion through their interaction.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates dynamic engagement through the stopper head mechanism that protrudes to stop the swing at specific points in its rotation. This simple mechanical constraint generates complex spinning patterns and challenges user coordination, providing high engagement value despite the simplicity of individual components.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a cost-effective, durable, and engaging play experience by promoting continuous spinning motion without electronic components, suitable for physical therapy and offering a new design in the mechanical toy category.

Implementation Method 1

The swing rotates easily around the axis of the handles in a 360° arc

Methodology Applied

Scientific EffectGravitational force: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

causing the swing to spin around the body

Methodology Applied

Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS9737823B2Mechanical spinning toy

Publication Date: 2017.08.22 NORTON ROCKY LYNN

AI summary

A mechanical spinning toy provides a rectangular body, with a cylindrical handle protruding perpendicularly from the center of each long side. The handles provide an axis of rotation for a swing, with two arms extending down the long sides of the body and terminating in a plate with a narrow clearance from the end of the body. The swing rotates easily around the axis of the handles in a 360° arc. An aperture extends longitudinally through the centerline of the body, containing a cylindrical stopper head. A simple mechanism causes the stopper head to protrude a short distance from one end of the body or the other, and may be retracted with a quick twist of the user's wrists or a quick press of the user's thumb. This enables the swing to continue rotating around the body.