Spinning Machine Yarn Accumulating Roller Tension Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinning machines face challenges in maintaining consistent yarn tension and quality due to insufficient nipping force between rollers, leading to slipping and uneven yarn production, along with increased maintenance needs and component variability.

Innovation Solution

A spinning machine design featuring a yarn accumulating device with a rotary yarn accumulating roller made from high abrasion-resistant material, which applies tension to the spun yarn directly, providing a stable and uniform feeding speed and reducing the number of components by integrating tension adjustment and transportation functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a rubber nip roller is used to nipping and transport yarn, then the yarn can be gripped and transported, but the nipping force is insufficient and varies due to abrasion and assembling accuracy, causing slipping and uneven yarn production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn production consistencyVSAvoidnipping force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The yarn transport function is divided into multiple independent metal rollers (delivery roller, front roller, back roller) that can be precisely controlled. Each roller operates independently with precise speed control to maintain consistent yarn tension and eliminate the variability caused by rubber roller abrasion and assembly inaccuracies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The material of the rollers is changed from rubber to metal, which fundamentally changes the friction characteristics and nipping force stability. Metal rollers provide consistent, predictable friction coefficients that do not degrade over time, ensuring stable nipping force and eliminating slipping during yarn transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the yarn nipping force is increased to prevent slipping, then yarn transport stability improves, but the structure becomes more complex and maintenance becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn transport stabilityVSAvoidroller structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The functions of yarn nipping, tensioning, and transport are merged into a single integrated metal roller system. The delivery roller, front roller, and back roller work together as a unified mechanism with precise speed ratios, eliminating the need for separate tensioning devices and complex adjustment mechanisms required by rubber roller systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The metal rollers serve multiple functions simultaneously: they nip the yarn, apply controlled tension through speed differential, and transport the yarn. This multi-functionality reduces the overall number of components needed compared to systems that separate these functions into different elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple components are used for tension adjustment and yarn transport, then yarn quality control improves, but the number of components increases and maintenance burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn quality controlVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The metal roller system performs both tension control and yarn transport functions through a single integrated mechanism. The speed ratio control between rollers provides tension adjustment while the rollers themselves perform the transport function, eliminating the need for separate tensioning devices and reducing total component count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The tensioning function and transport function are merged into the same roller mechanism. By controlling the speed differential between the delivery roller and the front/back rollers, tension is automatically regulated while the yarn is transported, combining what were previously separate functions into one unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Force

If rubber on the nip roller surface abrades, then the nipping force decreases and yarn slips frequently, requiring regular replacement and increasing maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenipping forceVSAvoidroller service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The rubber coating on rollers is replaced with durable metal rollers that do not require periodic replacement. While metal rollers have different friction characteristics, they provide consistent performance throughout their service life without the degradation issues of rubber, eliminating the need for regular maintenance and replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The roller material is changed from rubber to metal, which fundamentally alters the wear characteristics. Metal rollers maintain their surface properties and nipping force throughout their operational life, unlike rubber rollers that gradually lose friction and nipping capability due to abrasion, thereby extending service life and reducing maintenance frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures stable yarn production with reduced slipping, improved durability, and uniform quality across spinning units, simplifying the machine structure and reducing maintenance burdens while maintaining consistent yarn tension.

Implementation Method 1

The yarn accumulating device applies tension to the spun yarn fed from the spinning device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The yarn accumulating device temporarily accumulates the spun yarn by winding the spun yarn around the yarn accumulating roller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2169096B9Spinning machine
Publication Date: 2012.04.11 MURATA MASCH LTD
  • EP2169096B9 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2169096B9 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2169096B9 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A spinning unit 2 of a spinning machine includes a spinning device 9, a winding device 13, and a yarn slack eliminating device 12. The spinning device 9 produces a spun yarn 10 by applying twists to a fiber bundle 8. The winding device 13 forms a package 45 by winding the spun yarn 10 fed from the spinning device 9. The yarn slack eliminating device 12 is provided between the spinning device 9 and the winding device 13, and temporarily accumulates the spun yarn 10 by winding the spun yarn 10 around an outer periphery of a rotating yarn slack eliminating roller 21. The spinning machine applies tension by the yarn slack eliminating device 12 to the spun yarn 10 fed from the spinning device 9 (Fig. 1).