Spiral Filter Element With Conical Ends For Space Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing air filters for internal combustion engines face challenges in maximizing filtration capacity while adapting to limited mounting spaces, as they often have a fixed shape that does not efficiently utilize available space, leading to suboptimal filtration performance.

Innovation Solution

A spirally rolled filter element with alternatingly open and closed flow channels, formed by combining a corrugated and flat filter layer, allows for a tapered shape that optimally fits various mounting spaces, enhancing filtration capacity by creating a larger surface area through strategically positioned adhesive beads to control channel openness at axial ends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a fixed cylindrical shape is used for the filter element, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the filtration capacity is limited due to inefficient space utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoidfilter element structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filter element uses a spirally rolled construction with conical end faces instead of a simple cylindrical shape. The spiral rolling creates a curved, tapered structure that better utilizes the available mounting space while maintaining structural integrity and filtration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The filter element transitions from a two-dimensional cylindrical surface to a three-dimensional spirally rolled structure with conical end faces. This dimensional transformation allows the filter to expand in multiple directions, maximizing space utilization and filtration capacity within the same mounting envelope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If flow channels are continuously open in axial direction, then the fluid flow resistance is low, but the filtration capacity is reduced as fluid does not pass through the filter medium

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoidfluid flow resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The flow channels are segmented into alternating open and closed sections along the axial direction. This segmentation forces the fluid to alternate between flowing through open channels and permeating through the filter medium in closed channel sections, ensuring both low resistance and high filtration capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow channels exhibit periodic alternation between open and closed states along the axial direction. This periodic structure creates a rhythm of fluid flow that alternates between direct flow paths and filtration paths, optimizing both flow resistance and filtration capacity throughout the filter element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the filter element is designed with uniform axial length, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the adaptation to various mounting spaces is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to mounting spaceVSAvoidfilter element production
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The filter element employs asymmetric conical end faces with different semi-vertical angles instead of uniform cylindrical ends. This asymmetric design allows the filter to adapt to various mounting space geometries while the spirally rolled construction maintains manufacturing simplicity through a single continuous rolling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved filtration capacity by maximizing the use of available space, ensuring that no flow channel is continuously open axially, forcing fluid to permeate radially through walls and into neighboring channels for axial discharge, thereby enhancing purification efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a corrugated filter layer is used onto which a flat filter layer is glued wherein as a result of the corrugations flow channels are formed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrugation: Corrugation

Implementation Method 2

the filter element with a spirally rolled filter sheet that has parallel extending flow channels for the fluid to be purified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpiral rolling: Helix

Implementation Method 3

Closure of the flow channels at the axial end faces is realized by means of an adhesive bead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 4

Filter device for filtration of gaseous fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS8608819B2Filter device for filtering gaseous fluids
Publication Date: 2013.12.17 MANN HUMMEL GMBH
  • US8608819B2 patent drawing
  • US8608819B2 patent drawing
  • US8608819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter device for filtering gaseous fluids has a spiral-shaped wound filter path having parallel flow channels for the fluid. The flow channels end in a wound state at an axial face of the filter element at axially different positions. At the second, opposite axial face, the filter element has a geometry deviating from that of the first face.