Spiral Fish Release Device for Deep Water Descent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fish release devices are either complex and expensive or simple and ineffective, often failing to securely return fish to deep water depths without malfunction, particularly in areas where the ocean bottom is not a viable release point due to extreme depth.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a central member with a spiral member and swivels, allowing the spiral member to spin on an axis, which can be threaded through a fish's jaw or gills, and a weight to overcome buoyancy, enabling secure and controlled release at desired depths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex fish release devices are used, then reliability of deep water release is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of deep water releaseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into distinct functional segments: a central member for structural support, a spiral member for fish attachment and rotation, and a weight for depth control. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function reliably while keeping the overall device simple and manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex mechanical locking mechanisms to secure the fish, the invention uses the fish's own buoyancy and the spiral member's geometry to hold the fish. The fish is attached to the spiral member which naturally constrains it through its helical shape, eliminating the need for additional complex securing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Device complexity

If simple fish release devices are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ability to securely return fish to deep water without malfunction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidability to securely return fish to deep water
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A weight is attached to the central member to counteract the buoyancy of the fish and the device itself. This weight provides the necessary downward force to ensure the fish is returned to deep water depths without requiring complex mechanical systems to control descent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The spiral member is designed to rotate freely around the central member, allowing the device to adapt dynamically to the fish's movement and water currents. This rotational freedom ensures the fish remains securely attached while the device maintains stability during descent and release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If existing release devices are used, then manufacturing cost may be reduced, but adaptability to different fish sizes and depths deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidadaptability to different fish sizes and depths
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed with universal components that can accommodate various fish sizes and depths. The spiral member's helical structure can secure different sized fish, while the weight can be adjusted to match different depth requirements. This multi-functionality is achieved through simple, standardized components that maintain ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device allows for parameter adjustments such as weight selection and spiral member configuration to adapt to different fishing conditions and fish sizes. These parameter changes can be made without fundamentally altering the device structure, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while enhancing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If release devices are designed for bottom impact, then release mechanism is simplified, but applicability to deep water areas without accessible bottom deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease mechanism complexityVSAvoidapplicability to deep water areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses the fish's own buoyancy and the spiral member's rotational capability to achieve release without requiring bottom impact. As the fish approaches the surface, its buoyancy causes the spiral member to rotate and naturally release the fish, eliminating the need for complex bottom-impact-dependent mechanisms and enabling use in deep water areas where the bottom is inaccessible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device securely holds and releases multiple fish at various depths, including deep water, with minimal chance of malfunction, accommodating different sinker weights and fish sizes, and is durable and affordable, making it suitable for both recreational and commercial fishing.

Implementation Method 1

a weight to overcome buoyancy, enabling secure and controlled release at desired depths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

allowing the spiral member to spin on an axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Data Source

PatentUS10448624B2Deepwater fish release device
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 PARKS MICHAEL
  • US10448624B2 patent drawing
  • US10448624B2 patent drawing
  • US10448624B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for releasing a fish into deep water, comprising a central member having an upper end portion and a lower end portion, a spiral member attached to the central member, the spiral member being spaced away from the central member and having a free end, a plurality of swivels, wherein one of the swivels can be connected the upper end portion of the central member and another of said swivels can be connected to the lower end portion of the central member, and a weight connected to the lower swivel. The device can further provide a weight on the central member that overcomes buoyancy of the fish.