Spiral Magnetorheological Polishing for Mid-Spatial-Frequency Error Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing magnetorheological polishing methods introduce mid-frequency ripple errors, leading to increased mid-spatial-frequency errors, which compromise the performance of optical components by causing beam modulation, reduced image contrast, and nonlinear self-focusing.

Innovation Solution

A spiral magnetorheological polishing method that alters the spatial posture of the tool influence function in real time by changing the angle between the scanning direction and workpiece material removal direction, combined with random line spacing, to eliminate mid-frequency ripple errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a raster scanning path is employed in magnetorheological polishing, then the polishing process can be systematically applied across the optical surface, but mid-frequency ripple errors are introduced due to the convolution of the removal function and the periodic scanning path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing efficiencyVSAvoidmid-frequency error
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transforming the static raster scanning path into a dynamic spiral scanning path. The polishing tool follows a spiral trajectory with continuously varying radius and angle, defined by equations r(θ) and θ(t), which eliminates the periodic convolution residuals inherent in raster scanning while maintaining systematic coverage of the optical surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs curvature by replacing the straight-line raster paths with a spiral curved path. The spiral trajectory inherently distributes material removal more uniformly across the surface, avoiding the regular periodic patterns that cause mid-frequency ripple errors in linear scanning methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Manufacturing precision

If pseudo-random paths are used to control mid-frequency errors, then error distribution can be improved, but the path complexity increases and extremely strict requirements are imposed on machine tool dynamic performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemid-frequency error controlVSAvoidpath complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by using a mathematically defined spiral path with controlled radius and angular velocity variations instead of pseudo-random coordinates. This approach maintains precision improvement while avoiding the excessive complexity and machine tool performance requirements associated with pseudo-random paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the magic angle-step method is employed to suppress mid-frequency errors, then a specific angle positioning can be achieved, but convolution residuals still introduce mid-frequency ripple errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemid-frequency error suppressionVSAvoidripple error elimination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent overcomes the limitation of the magic angle-step method by implementing continuous dynamic angle adjustment along the spiral path rather than fixed angle steps. This continuous variation in scanning angle completely eliminates the periodic convolution residuals that persist in stepped angular methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces mid-spatial-frequency errors by smoothing out mid-frequency ripple errors and suppressing irregular spikes, enhancing the performance and accuracy of optical components.

Implementation Method 1

Magnetorheological polishing uses small-sized polishing tools to 'repair' surface shape errors of larger surfaces along specific polishing paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetorheological effect: Magnetorheological Fluid

Implementation Method 2

an angle between a scanning direction and a workpiece material removal direction is changed in real time during scanning, to alter a spatial posture of a removal function on a polishing surface in a spiral manner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpiral motion mechanism: Helix

Data Source

PatentUS12629794B2Spiral magnetorheological polishing method for mid-spatial-frequency error control
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 NAT UNIV OF DEFENSE TECH
  • US12629794B2 patent drawing
  • US12629794B2 patent drawing
  • US12629794B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spiral magnetorheological polishing method for mid-frequency error control is provided, relating to the technical field of optical polishing. The method includes: scanning along a polishing path by using a magnetorheological polishing method, and removing a material in a spiral manner with a polishing tool to achieve spiral magnetorheological polishing of a workpiece. An angle between a scanning direction and a workpiece material removal direction is changed in real time during scanning, to alter a spatial posture of a removal function on a polishing surface in a spiral manner, thereby reducing mid-frequency errors. The method further includes: during scanning, randomly changing a processing line spacing in real time to further achieve suppression of mid-frequency ripple errors. A scanning strategy employs raster scanning processing; when the scanning strategy employs raster scanning processing, the processing line spacing is a raster scanning spacing.