Spiral Spring Braking Mechanism for Orthotic Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing joint devices for orthoses and prostheses require complex and bulky hydraulic systems for braking, which are inefficient in terms of space and weight, and lack discreetness when worn under clothing.

Innovation Solution

A joint device utilizing a spiral spring with contoured contact surfaces that creates a high braking moment through friction, allowing for compact design and adjustable braking via an actuator, with optional sensor integration for adaptive control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hydraulic damping or braking systems are used, then reliable braking function is achieved, but device complexity and space requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential braking function from complex hydraulic systems and implements it using a simple spiral spring mechanism with friction contact surfaces. The spiral spring is braced in the direction of contact surfaces about a rotation axis, causing lateral flanks to contact the surfaces and generate friction-based braking moment, eliminating the need for hydraulic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces hydraulic damping systems with a purely mechanical spiral spring-based friction braking system. The spiral spring, when braced, creates lateral contact with contoured surfaces through mechanical friction, substituting the hydraulic fluid-based damping mechanism with a solid-mechanics-based solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If hydraulic damping systems are used, then reliable braking function is achieved, but weight and space consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential braking function from heavy hydraulic systems and implements it using a lightweight spiral spring mechanism. The spiral spring, when braced in the direction of contact surfaces, generates sufficient friction-based braking moment with minimal mass, eliminating the weight of hydraulic pumps, reservoirs, and fluid systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If hydraulic damping systems are used, then reliable braking function is achieved, but the joint device cannot be worn discreetly under clothing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking functionVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the braking function from bulky hydraulic systems and implements it in a compact form using a spiral spring mechanism with contoured contact surfaces. The bracing of the spiral spring in the direction of contact surfaces creates an efficient friction interface that achieves reliable braking in a minimal volume, enabling discreet wearability under clothing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Force

If high braking moment is achieved through friction, then low switching force is required, but friction surface area must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching forceVSAvoidfriction surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses contoured contact surfaces with radially conical or radially curved designs to increase the friction surface area. The curvature of these surfaces corresponds to the successive radially outward turns of the spiral spring, creating progressive braking action and maximizing friction contact without requiring excessive surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a spiral spring mechanism that dynamically adjusts the contact pressure and friction surface engagement. When the spiral spring is braced in the direction of contact surfaces, it progressively engages the lateral flanks with the contoured surfaces, creating a dynamic friction interface that adapts to the applied load and switching requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The joint device achieves reliable braking with low switching force and minimal space usage, providing progressive braking and self-reinforcement, while ensuring discreet wearability and adaptive control through actuator and sensor systems.

Implementation Method 1

a very high braking moment to be built up by friction at very low switching forces and switching paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the contact surfaces are contoured, in particular with a radially conical or radially curved design, to increase the friction surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7935153B2Joint device
Publication Date: 2011.05.03 OTTOBOCK SE & CO KGAA
  • US7935153B2 patent drawing
  • US7935153B2 patent drawing
  • US7935153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A joint device for an orthoses or prostheses includes an upper part, a lower part mounted on the upper part in such a way as to turn about a pivot axis, and braking means that brakes or blocks a pivoting movement of the lower part relative to the upper part. The braking means includes a spiral spring arranged between two contact surfaces and is mounted such that it can be braced in the direction of the contact surfaces about a rotation axis parallel to the pivot axis.