Split Transaction Coherency Protocol Null Data Packet Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In symmetric multiprocessor systems, the failure to deliver data within a specified time period in a split transaction coherency protocol leads to machine errors and system crashes, as existing protocols do not effectively manage data unavailability during the data tenure.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a split transaction coherency protocol that uses a null data packet to indicate data unavailability, allowing for transaction completion without error reporting, by including a data status field in data packets to communicate data availability or unavailability during the data tenure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is not available within the specified data tenure, then machine errors and system crashes occur in existing protocols, but the patent introduces a null data packet mechanism to indicate data unavailability, allowing transaction completion without error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a null data packet as an intermediary mechanism between the data source and data sink. When data is unavailable during the data tenure, the data source sends a null data packet containing a null indicator instead of causing a machine error. This intermediary allows the system to gracefully handle data unavailability while maintaining transaction completion, thus improving reliability without fundamentally changing the protocol structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the data packet structure by adding a data status field that can indicate either normal data availability or null data unavailability. This parameter change allows the protocol to distinguish between different data states and handle them appropriately, enabling transaction completion even when data is unavailable, thereby improving system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the protocol requires data to be delivered within a strict time period, then data availability is ensured, but machine errors occur when data cannot be delivered on time, whereas the patent allows modified data tenures to prevent errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction completionVSAvoiddata tenure extension
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic data tenure handling by allowing the data tenure to be extended or modified when data is not immediately available. Instead of enforcing a strict fixed deadline that causes machine errors, the system dynamically adjusts the data tenure based on actual data availability, allowing transactions to complete successfully even with delayed data delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If existing protocols report machine errors when data is unavailable, then data integrity is maintained, but system crashes occur requiring reboot, whereas the patent completes transactions without error reporting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem continuityVSAvoiddata availability information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful condition of data unavailability (which traditionally causes machine errors and system crashes) into a beneficial situation by introducing the null data packet mechanism. The null indicator in the data packet transforms an error condition into a valid transaction completion state, allowing the system to continue operating without crashes while still conveying the data availability status to the appropriate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11449489B2Split transaction coherency protocol in a data processing system
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11449489B2 patent drawing
  • US11449489B2 patent drawing
  • US11449489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique for operating a data processing system that implements a split transaction coherency protocol that has an address tenure and a data tenure includes receiving, at a data source, a command (that includes an address tenure for requested data) that is issued from a data sink. The data source issues a response that indicates data associated with the address tenure is available to be transferred to the data sink during a data tenure. In response to determining that the data is available subsequent to issuing the response, the data source issues a first data packet to the data sink that includes the data during the data tenure. In response to determining that the data is not available subsequent to issuing the response, the data source issues a second data packet to the data sink that includes a data header that indicates the data is unavailable.