Split Cooling System With 3-Port Valve and Sealing Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing integrated flow control valve systems for internal combustion engines face increased costs and complexity, with compromised cooling performance due to the need for a 4-way control scheme, leading to unstable temperature control and ineffective heat management, particularly when applying variable split cooling.

Innovation Solution

A split cooling system is implemented, featuring a 3-port integrated flow control valve and a split cooler with a sealing member that increases flow resistance and reduces heat transfer by sealing off channels in the cylinder block when the temperature exceeds a preset level, allowing for efficient heat management without the need for a variable split cooling port.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If an integrated flow control valve based on a 4-way control scheme is used to control cooling water flow to the radiator, heater core, oil cooler, and EGR cooler, then the flow rate distribution can be optimized, but the cost burden and layout complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate distribution controlVSAvoidlayout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cooling system into two independent circuits: a heater circuit (including heater core and EGR cooler) and an oil cooling circuit (including oil cooler). The integrated flow control valve is simplified from a 4-way scheme to a 3-port scheme, with each port controlling flow to one of these two circuits. This segmentation reduces the number of control ports needed while maintaining effective flow distribution control across all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If an integrated flow control valve based on a 4-way control scheme is used to control cooling water flow, then the flow rate distribution can be optimized, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate distribution controlVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cooling water flow control into two independent circuits (heater circuit and oil cooling circuit), allowing the use of a simplified 3-port integrated flow control valve instead of a complex 4-way valve. This reduction in valve complexity directly lowers manufacturing costs while preserving the ability to optimize flow distribution to all cooling components through the two circuit architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If cooling water is controlled only for the engine, then the temperature control can be simplified, but the temperature of cooling water in the EGR cooler and oil cooler increases, deteriorating cooling performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control simplicityVSAvoidcooling water temperature in EGR cooler and oil cooler
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates separate control circuits for the heater/EGR cooler and oil cooling functions. The integrated flow control valve independently regulates cooling water flow to each circuit, ensuring that the EGR cooler and oil cooler receive adequately cooled water even when engine cooling demands vary. This circuit segmentation enables proper temperature control in all components without requiring complex unified temperature management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality control by allowing different cooling water temperatures and flow rates in different circuits based on local requirements. The heater circuit can operate with warmer water while the oil cooling circuit receives cooler water, with each circuit's flow independently controlled by the integrated flow control valve. This enables optimized cooling performance in each component without compromising overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If a variable split cooling port is added to the integrated flow control valve to implement variable split cooling, then the temperature control adaptability improves, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control adaptabilityVSAvoidvalve structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves variable split cooling functionality through the two independent circuit architecture controlled by the 3-port integrated flow control valve, eliminating the need for an additional variable split cooling port. The valve can independently adjust flow distribution between the heater circuit and oil cooling circuit, providing the necessary adaptability for variable split cooling operations without increasing valve structural complexity or requiring a 4-way control scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration stabilizes cooling water temperature control, enhances heat management, reduces costs, and simplifies packaging by eliminating the variable split cooling port, while maintaining effective cooling performance across varying engine loads.

Implementation Method 1

a sealing member configured to be filled in the coupling groove and expanded when the temperature of the cooling water supplied into the water jacket is equal to or higher than a preset temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

a method for forming a cooling channel in a cylinder block and a cylinder head of the engine and forcibly circulating cooling water to the cooling channel by an operation of a water pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 3

an integrated flow control valve configured to include an inlet provided to be supplied with the cooling water of the cylinder head and a plurality of valves that are opened and closed to distribute the cooling water introduced through the inlet to an oil heat exchanger, a heater core, and a radiator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10190477B2Split cooling system of internal combusion engine
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10190477B2 patent drawing
  • US10190477B2 patent drawing
  • US10190477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A split cooling system of an internal combustion engine may include a water pump configured to circulate cooling water; a cylinder head and a cylinder block configured to be supplied with the cooling water from the water pump; an integrated flow control valve configured to include an inlet provided to be supplied with the cooling water of the cylinder head and a plurality of valves that are configured to be opened or closed to distribute the cooling water introduced through the inlet to an oil heat exchanger, a heater core, and a radiator; and a split cooler configured to be mounted at the cylinder block to provide a split cooling channel in the cylinder block and the cylinder header.