Split Core Forming Die for Undercut Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming undercut parts are costly due to increased process complexity, high die costs, and require additional components, making it difficult to reduce costs and simplify the process.

Innovation Solution

A forming die with a lower die having a bottom and side wall, an upper die that moves parallel to the side wall, and a push-in die that moves between the side and upper die, utilizing first and second split cores with inclined surfaces that slide to form undercut parts, reducing the number of components and simplifying the structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a collapsible core is used to form undercut parts, then the forming capability is improved, but the driving mechanism becomes complicated and assembly time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforming capabilityVSAvoiddriving mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into multiple split cores (first split core and second split core) that can move independently relative to each other. The first split core is disposed above the second split core, and they can slide against each other to change the overall diameter, eliminating the need for a complex collapsible mechanism while maintaining forming capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If inverted trapezoidal grooves are machined in sliding surfaces, then the split cores can slide, but machining difficulty increases and die cost becomes high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding capabilityVSAvoidmachining difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of machining complex inverted trapezoidal grooves into the sliding surfaces, the invention uses simple inclined surfaces on the first and second split cores that slide against each other. The sliding action is achieved through the relative movement of these inclined surfaces, eliminating the need for difficult negative angle groove machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Ease of operation

If additional support members and holders are added to drive split cores, then the split cores can be driven, but the number of components increases and die cost becomes high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The first split core and second split core are integrated into a single movable shaft member structure, where the first split core is disposed above the second split core on the same shaft. This merging eliminates the need for separate support members and holders for each split core, reducing the total component count while maintaining the ability to drive both cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If a complex driving mechanism is used, then the split cores can be actuated, but assembly and adjustment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation capabilityVSAvoidassembly and adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The movable shaft member is segmented into first and second split cores that can be assembled separately and then combined. This segmentation allows for easier assembly and adjustment compared to a monolithic complex mechanism, as each split core can be positioned and adjusted independently before being fixed together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for the formation of undercut parts at a lower cost with a simpler structure, reducing assembly and adjustment time, and minimizing die costs by using fewer components and a more straightforward sliding mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

The second split core approaches the bottom surface of the die body while sliding on the first split core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The first split core includes a pair of first inclined surfaces that are joined together so as to narrow with an upper surface of the first split core as a center

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInclined plane: Inclined Plane

Data Source

PatentUS10029296B2Forming die, and undercut forming method
Publication Date: 2018.07.24 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US10029296B2 patent drawing
  • US10029296B2 patent drawing
  • US10029296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A forming die includes: a lower forming die having a bottom part and a side wall part; an upper forming die that is movable toward the bottom part of the lower forming die along an axis parallel to the side wall part of the lower forming die; and a push-in die that is movable toward the bottom part of the lower forming die along the axis between the side wall part of the lower forming die and the upper forming die.