Split Core Injection Molding Device for Tubular Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing injection molding technologies require cores with draft angles to facilitate easy removal and avoid additional machining processes for tubular parts with constant inner diameters.

Innovation Solution

An injection molding device using split cores with inclined split surfaces that allow sliding movement without draft angles, aided by an air supplier to enhance separation and removal of the core from the molded article.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a core with draft angle is used to facilitate core removal, then ease of operation is improved, but the molded article includes tapered surfaces requiring additional machining processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore removalVSAvoidcylinder hole straightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into two separate cores (first core and second core) that can move independently. Each core has a cylindrical outer shape without draft angle, but they can slide relative to each other along the axial direction, enabling easy removal while maintaining the straight cylindrical shape of the molded article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cores are designed to be movable rather than fixed. The cores can slide in the axial direction relative to each other and relative to the mold, allowing dynamic adjustment during the molding and demolding processes without requiring draft angles on the core surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If a straight-shaped core without draft angle is used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to material adhesion during cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecylinder hole straightnessVSAvoidcore removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single straight core is segmented into two separate cores that can move independently. This segmentation allows the cores to be extracted from the molded article by sliding them axially, overcoming the adhesion problem without compromising the straight cylindrical shape.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cores are designed with movable capability in the axial direction. By making the cores dynamic rather than static, they can be easily removed after cooling without requiring draft angles, thus maintaining manufacturing precision while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If multiple core pins are used to eliminate draft angle, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases due to complicated member structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore removalVSAvoidcore structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The core is divided into two simple cylindrical cores without complex structures. Each core maintains a straightforward cylindrical shape with movable capability, avoiding the need for complicated member structures while enabling easy removal through axial sliding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cores are designed with simple cylindrical shapes and movable capability. By combining simplicity in shape with dynamic movement capability, the system achieves easy core removal without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the efficient injection molding of tubular articles with constant inner diameters using cores with simple structures and no draft angles, eliminating the need for additional machining processes.

Implementation Method 1

a slider (a slider 3, which will be described later, for example) that causes the first core or the second core to move in a sliding manner and be inserted into and pulled out of the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

an air supplier (an air supplier 6, which will be described later, for example) that supplies air to the split surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir lubrication: Air Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS20250033261A1Injection molding device
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250033261A1 patent drawing
  • US20250033261A1 patent drawing
  • US20250033261A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide an injection molding device capable of injection-molding a molded article in a tubular shape with a constant inner diameter by using a core with a simple structure with no draft angle. An injection molding device that injection-molds a molded article in a tubular shape with a constant inner diameter includes: a first mold and a second mold that form a cavity in a clamped state; a first core and a second core that are formed by splitting a core in a columnar shape disposed inside the cavity and have split surfaces inclined with respect to an axial center direction of the core and split from one end to the other end of the cavity in the axial center direction; and a slider that causes the first core or the second core to move in a sliding manner and be inserted into and pulled out of the cavity, in which the slider causes the first core or the second core to slide in a direction in which an angle formed with the axial center direction is within a range of greater than 0 degrees and less than an inclination angle of the split surface in a sectional view including the axial center and perpendicularly intersecting the split surface.