Enterprise Platform for Split-Dollar Life Insurance Policy Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Recent legislation and proposed regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and IRS regulations, have created complexities for split-dollar life insurance arrangements, particularly in terms of tax treatment and ownership, necessitating comprehensive accounting and innovative products to minimize regulatory and tax consequences while maintaining the benefits of split-dollar funding.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and processes that utilize an enterprise platform to collect and process input parameters for life insurance policies, allowing for the creation, tracking, and conversion of insurance policies, including split-dollar and jointly-owned policies, to ensure compliance with regulations, optimize policy objectives, and minimize tax consequences. This platform calculates and communicates the terms of the policies, monitors performance, and generates reports to facilitate compliance and administration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If comprehensive accounting and tracking systems are implemented to ensure regulatory compliance, then tax consequences are minimized and compliance is ensured, but device complexity and administrative burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidaccounting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: tracking premiums paid by owner and non-owner, calculating cash surrender value allocations, monitoring death benefit distributions, generating tax accounting reports, and maintaining policy performance records. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate tracking systems for each regulatory requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The insurance provider acts as an intermediary between the owner and non-owner parties, centralizing the accounting and tracking functions. The provider's system automatically captures transaction data, applies regulatory rules, and generates compliance reports, eliminating the need for parties to maintain separate complex tracking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If split-dollar arrangements are structured to minimize tax consequences, then economic benefits are optimized, but the ability to enter into arrangements is restricted by legislation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetax consequencesVSAvoidarrangement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts policy structures and accounting treatments based on current regulatory requirements and tax implications. It can restructure existing split-dollar arrangements or convert them to jointly-owned policies when regulatory conditions change, allowing the arrangement to adapt rather than remain static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors and responds to changes in regulatory parameters and tax rates by adjusting the economic structure of the arrangement. It calculates optimal premium allocations, cash value distributions, and death benefit allocations based on current tax parameters to minimize consequences while maintaining arrangement viability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If existing policies are converted to more favorable structures, then tax consequences are minimized and objectives are optimized, but administrative effort and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetax consequencesVSAvoidconversion processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of existing policies to identify conversion opportunities and calculate projected tax benefits before actual conversion occurs. It pre-calculates the economic impact of potential restructuring scenarios, allowing informed decision-making without rushed conversions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors policy performance and tax implications, providing feedback on whether conversion to a different structure would be beneficial. This ongoing assessment allows conversions to occur only when genuinely advantageous, avoiding unnecessary administrative effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7877303B2System and methods for tracking the relative interests of the parties to an insurance policy
Publication Date: 2011.01.25 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
  • US7877303B2 patent drawing
  • US7877303B2 patent drawing
  • US7877303B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and processes are provided for projecting, tracking and assessing the performance of and relative interests of the parties to one or more cooperatively-funded insurance policies, such as split-dollar or jointly-owned life insurance policies. Certain embodiments can also optimize the structure and function of existing insurance policies. Input data regarding actual and potential parties to an insurance contract, regulatory considerations, as well as the objectives that the parties intend to achieve, is used to propose, create, track, maintain, and implement an insurance policy or a group insurance plan. The input data is communicated to an enterprise platform via a web server. The enterprise platform includes applications which process the data. Data processing functions performed include proposal and policy generation, policy reevaluation and re-proposal, policy conversion, and report generation. The systems and processes optimize achievement of policy objectives and minimize tax consequences under applicable tax codes.