Split Flow Tube Ionization for Multi-Analyte Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current analytical techniques for detecting low-level threat agents and illicit substances, such as explosives and narcotics, are limited by sensitivity and selectivity issues, requiring multiple sampling events and instruments to identify various analytes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A split flow tube system with multiple ionization sources and reaction regions allows for simultaneous detection of multiple analytes in a single sampling event by isolating reactant, dopant, and analyte species into separate reaction regions, using different ionization sources concurrently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sampling events and instruments are used to detect various threat agents and illicit substances, then detection coverage is improved, but detection time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple ionization sources (electron impact, chemical ionization, photoionization) and multiple reaction regions within a single mass spectrometer system, allowing simultaneous detection of multiple analyte types through one sampling event rather than requiring separate instruments and sampling events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mass spectrometer is configured with multiple ionization sources and reaction regions that can detect different classes of analytes (explosives, narcotics, chemical warfare agents) using a single instrument platform, making the system universally applicable to various detection needs without requiring instrument changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If sensitivity is increased to detect below saturation levels, then detection capability is improved, but chemical noise increases which offsets improvements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidchemical noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the ionization and reaction process into multiple separate regions, each optimized for specific analyte types. By segmenting the detection process into distinct ionization sources and reaction zones, the system can selectively enhance sensitivity for target analytes while isolating and reducing chemical noise from non-target species

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each ionization source and reaction region is locally optimized for detecting specific classes of analytes. The electron impact source region is optimized for explosives, chemical ionization for narcotics, and photoionization for chemical warfare agents, allowing each region to operate at optimal sensitivity while minimizing interference from other analyte classes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple ionization sources are used to detect different analyte types, then detection versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalyte detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple ionization sources and reaction regions are nested within a single mass spectrometer housing and shared vacuum system. The compact nested arrangement allows multiple functional components to coexist in a unified instrument platform, reducing overall system complexity compared to using separate instruments for each ionization type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances sensitivity and selectivity, enabling the detection of multiple analytes with a single sampling event without the need for multiple sampling events or instrument changes, improving detection capabilities below ppt levels.

Implementation Method 1

a first ionization source that produces first reactant ions by ionization of a first carrier gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 2

a second ionization source that produces second reactant ions by ionization of a second carrier gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Implementation Method 3

first and second unreacted carrier gases and analyte ions formed by chemical reactions between the first and second reactant ions and analyte molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reactions: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3824279B1Device and system for selective ionization and analyte detection and method of using the same
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • EP3824279B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3824279B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3824279B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a system for selectively ionizing samples that may comprise a plurality of different analytes that are not normally detectable using the same ionization technique. The disclosed system comprises a unique split flow tube that can be coupled with a plurality of ionization sources to facilitate using different ionization techniques for the same sample. Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for determining the presence of analytes in a sample, wherein the number and type of detectable analytes that can be identified is increased and sensitivity and selectivity are not sacrificed.