Split-Gate FinFET DRAM Back-Gate Leakage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional DRAM devices face challenges in reducing operating power due to leakage issues, which conflicts with the need for lower threshold voltage to minimize power consumption, especially as semiconductor sizes decrease and single gate devices experience performance degradation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a split-gate DRAM with a FinFET structure, where a back-gate is connected to a conducting layer of the substrate, allowing for controlled threshold voltage and simultaneous control of multiple devices, operating in modes to reduce leakage and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the threshold voltage is reduced to lower wordline voltage and operating power, then power consumption decreases, but leakage increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating powerVSAvoidleakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The gate is divided into two independent gates: a front gate and a back gate. The front gate controls the primary channel conduction, while the back gate independently controls the threshold voltage to suppress leakage. This segmentation allows separate optimization of power consumption and leakage control without the trade-off present in single-gate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back gate voltage is dynamically adjusted to modify the threshold voltage of the FinFET. By changing the electrical parameter (gate voltage) of the back gate, the threshold voltage can be optimized to minimize leakage while maintaining low operating power, effectively decoupling the previously conflicting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the threshold voltage is kept high to prevent leakage, then leakage is reduced, but wordline voltage must be high increasing power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveleakageVSAvoidoperating power
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The gate is divided into two independent gates: a front gate and a back gate. The front gate controls the primary channel conduction, while the back gate independently controls the threshold voltage to suppress leakage. This segmentation allows separate optimization of power consumption and leakage control without the trade-off present in single-gate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back gate voltage is dynamically adjusted to modify the threshold voltage of the FinFET. By changing the electrical parameter (gate voltage) of the back gate, the threshold voltage can be optimized to minimize leakage while maintaining low operating power, effectively decoupling the previously conflicting parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If single gate devices are used to maintain simple structure, then device complexity is low, but performance degrades at smaller sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate structureVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The gate is divided into two independent gates: a front gate and a back gate. The front gate controls the primary channel conduction, while the back gate independently controls the threshold voltage to suppress leakage. This segmentation allows separate optimization of power consumption and leakage control without the trade-off present in single-gate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a planar gate structure to a three-dimensional FinFET structure with gates on opposite sides of the fin. This dimensional change provides superior electrostatic control and performance at scaled dimensions while maintaining a relatively simple manufacturing process compared to other multi-gate configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables low-power operation while maintaining dense array configurations by controlling the back-gate's electrical potential, reducing subthreshold channel leakage and the required wordline voltage during read/write operations.

Implementation Method 1

a back-gate at a first lateral side of the fin and in electrical contact with the conductive region... controlling the back-gate's electrical potential, reducing subthreshold channel leakage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectField effect transistor threshold voltage control: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

a storage capacitor connected to a first end of the fin... the threshold voltage of the fin of the FinFET retards leakage of stored charge out of the capacitance structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS7979836B2Split-gate DRAM with MuGFET, design structure, and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2011.07.12 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US7979836B2 patent drawing
  • US7979836B2 patent drawing
  • US7979836B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor structure for a dynamic random access memory cell, the structure including: a fin of a fin-type field effect transistor (FinFET) device formed over and spaced apart from a conductive region of a substrate; a storage capacitor connected to a first end of the fin; and a back-gate at a first lateral side of the fin and in electrical contact with the conductive region.