Split Gate Transistor Layout for DRAM Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dynamic random access memory (DRAM) designs face challenges in reducing leak current and achieving high integration and density, as they typically have a single gate controlling the switch on/off function, limiting the accommodation of additional circuits to control transistors beyond bit lines and word lines.

Innovation Solution

A novel transistor circuit layout structure is proposed, featuring a substrate with a transistor having a split gate with independent blocks, bit lines, word lines, and back lines, where the horizontal levels of the back lines differ from those of the bit and word lines, allowing for additional circuits to control transistors and reduce leak current.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single gate structure is used in conventional DRAM transistors, then the device complexity is low and manufacturing is easier, but the ability to accommodate additional control circuits is limited and leak current cannot be sufficiently reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to accommodate additional control circuitsVSAvoidtransistor gate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gate structure is divided into multiple independent gates (first gate, second gate, third gate) that can be controlled by separate control lines. This segmentation allows each gate to independently control different aspects of transistor operation, enabling additional control circuits to be accommodated while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a vertical stacking dimension by placing multiple gates at different heights and positions around the channel region. The first gate is positioned at a first height, the second gate at a second height, and the third gate at a third height, creating a three-dimensional gate structure that accommodates multiple control circuits without significantly increasing planar footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If conventional single-gate transistor structures are used, then the layout is simpler, but leak current reduction capability is insufficient for high-performance DRAM

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak current controlVSAvoidgate structure configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transistor gate is segmented into multiple independent gates (first gate, second gate, third gate) that can be controlled by separate control lines. This segmentation allows each gate to independently control different aspects of transistor operation, enabling better leak current suppression through coordinated gating while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multiple gates act as intermediaries between the control circuits and the channel region. Each gate can be independently controlled to modulate the electric field in the channel, providing fine-grained control over carrier flow and enabling effective leak current suppression through coordinated gating operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If more control circuits are added to reduce leak current, then DRAM performance improves, but the integration density and area utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDRAM performanceVSAvoidcircuit layout area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a planar gate arrangement to a vertical three-dimensional structure. Multiple gates are positioned at different heights around the channel region, allowing control circuits to be stacked vertically rather than spread horizontally. This significantly improves area utilization and integration density while accommodating the additional control circuits needed for enhanced DRAM performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If conventional DRAM transistor layouts are used, then manufacturing processes are simpler, but integration and density requirements for miniaturized electronic products cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration and densityVSAvoidtransistor circuit layout
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs vertical stacking of multiple gates and control circuits in the height dimension, enabling high integration and density without proportionally increasing planar footprint. This three-dimensional layout approach meets the demanding integration requirements for miniaturized electronic products while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing processes through standard semiconductor fabrication techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested structure where multiple gates and control circuits are arranged concentrically around the channel region at different vertical levels. The first gate, second gate, and third gate are positioned at different heights, creating a compact nested configuration that maximizes integration density while keeping the overall device footprint small

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS8724362B2Transistor circuit layout structure
Publication Date: 2014.05.13 ETRON TECH INC
  • US8724362B2 patent drawing
  • US8724362B2 patent drawing
  • US8724362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transistor circuit layout structure includes a transistor disposed on a substrate and including a source terminal, a drain terminal and a split gate including an independent first block and an independent second block, a bit line disposed on the source terminal and on the drain terminal or embedded in the substrate, a word line disposed on the first block, and a back line disposed on the second block. The horizontal level of the back line is different from that of the bit line and the word line.