Split Level Cabin Fuselage Design for Passenger Capacity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft fuselage designs face challenges in optimizing volume use for increased passenger capacity while ensuring passenger comfort, safety, and cargo storage, particularly in crash landing scenarios, as traditional methods either compromise passenger comfort or require significant structural redesign.

Innovation Solution

A split level cabin floor configuration within a fuselage of uniform cross-section, featuring upper and lower stacked cabins connected by stairs, elevators, or escalators, with crushable zones beneath the lower cabin to absorb crash energy, and cargo decks to optimize space utilization and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the aircraft body is stretched to increase passenger capacity, then the passenger seat count increases, but the ratio of passenger seat count to cargo capacity changes and aircraft takeoff and landing parameters are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger seat countVSAvoidcargo capacity ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal expansion (stretching the fuselage) to vertical expansion by implementing a split-level cabin configuration with upper and lower decks. This dimensional change allows increased passenger capacity while preserving the original fuselage length and cargo capacity ratio, thereby maintaining takeoff and landing parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The upper and lower cabins are nested vertically within the same fuselage cross-section. The lower cabin is positioned below the upper cabin, both sharing the same longitudinal space. This nesting arrangement maximizes passenger capacity without extending the aircraft body, thus preserving cargo capacity and flight parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Quantity of substance

If narrower aircraft seats are used to increase passenger abreast count, then passenger capacity increases, but passenger comfort is reduced and significant redesign of aircraft structural components is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger abreast countVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing the abreast count by narrowing seats in the horizontal dimension, the patent creates additional seating rows in the vertical dimension through the split-level cabin design. This allows maintaining standard seat widths for comfort while increasing overall passenger capacity through the upper and lower cabin arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If fuselage volume is optimized for increased passenger capacity, then passenger seating capacity increases, but cargo storage and crash landing safety requirements become more difficult to satisfy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger seating capacityVSAvoidcrash landing safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuselage is segmented into distinct functional zones: upper cabin, lower cabin, cargo hold, and crushable zone. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function - passenger capacity in the cabins, cargo storage in the hold, and crash energy absorption in the crushable zone beneath the lower cabin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A crushable zone is positioned beneath the lower cabin to provide pre-configured energy absorption capability for crash landings. This zone is designed in advance to deform and absorb impact energy, protecting passengers in the lower cabin during crash events while maintaining the structural integrity of the passenger compartments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances passenger seating capacity, maintains cargo storage efficiency, and provides enhanced safety during crash landings by utilizing vertical space effectively and incorporating energy-absorbing structures, while minimizing structural redesign and maintaining aerodynamic efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Cargo decks beneath passenger seating areas provide crushable zones that absorb energy during crash landings in order to protect passengers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS10589836B2Split level forward double deck airliner
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 THE BOEING CO
  • US10589836B2 patent drawing
  • US10589836B2 patent drawing
  • US10589836B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft includes a fuselage, having a crown section and a keel, a first passenger cabin, having a first floor, located in an aft portion the fuselage, and a first cargo deck, located below at least a portion of the first passenger cabin. A forward split level cabin including an upper second cabin having a second floor above the level of the first floor, and a lower third cabin beneath the upper second cabin and having a third floor below the level of the first floor. A second cargo deck is located in the forward portion of the fuselage and beneath at least a portion of the lower third cabin. The crown section has a substantially constant cross-sectional shape fore-to-aft above the first passenger cabin and the split level cabin.