Split LNA Topology for Carrier Aggregation Isolation and Low Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current RF front-end circuits for receivers face challenges in achieving high isolation and low noise figure when handling carrier aggregation signals across broad frequency ranges, due to limitations in passive splitters and low noise amplifiers, leading to signal interference and degradation in receiver sensitivity.

Innovation Solution

A flexible receiver front-end circuit design incorporating multiple low noise amplifiers (LNAs) with cascode amplifier stages and a split LNA configuration, allowing for efficient amplification and processing of single-band and multi-band RF signals with high linearity and isolation, while minimizing area usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a passive splitter is used to divide carrier aggregation signals, then signal distribution is achieved, but isolation between output ports deteriorates leading to signal interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal distributionVSAvoidsignal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The LNA is divided into multiple independent LNA stages, each handling specific frequency bands or carriers. This segmentation allows each LNA to be optimized for its specific function, improving isolation between signal paths and reducing interference compared to a single passive splitter approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple LNAs are introduced as intermediary active components between the signal source and the output paths. These LNAs provide galvanic isolation and active signal conditioning, replacing the passive splitter's isolation mechanism with active isolation that provides better performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single LNA operates over a broad frequency band, then frequency coverage is improved, but noise figure and linearity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency coverageVSAvoidnoise figure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The broad frequency band is segmented into multiple narrower bands, with each LNA stage optimized for a specific frequency range. This allows each LNA to achieve optimal noise figure and linearity for its designated band while collectively covering the entire frequency spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each LNA stage is designed with local quality optimization for its specific frequency band, using band-specific impedance matching, biasing, and component values. This ensures that each stage performs optimally at its designated frequencies rather than compromising performance across a broad band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple LNAs are used for different frequency bands, then frequency adaptability is improved, but circuit area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency adaptabilityVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple LNA stages are designed with universal functionality to handle different frequency bands and carrier aggregation configurations. Each LNA can operate independently or in combination with others, allowing the same hardware infrastructure to support multiple operating modes (single carrier, intra-band CA, inter-band CA) without requiring additional dedicated components for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple LNA stages and their associated circuitry are merged into a single integrated LNA circuit block. This consolidation shares common elements such as power supply networks, control logic, and output interfaces, reducing the total area compared to having completely separate LNA circuits for each frequency band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Power

If passive splitters and LNAs are used in conventional configurations, then signal amplification is achieved, but receiver sensitivity deteriorates due to noise and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal amplificationVSAvoidreceiver sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple LNAs are positioned as intermediary active components that provide clean, low-noise amplification before signal distribution. This active intermediary approach replaces passive splitting that occurs after amplification, ensuring that each signal path receives a clean amplified signal with minimal noise and interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The amplification function is segmented across multiple LNA stages, with each stage contributing to the overall signal quality. This segmentation allows for optimized noise figure at each stage and provides isolation that prevents noise and interference from propagating between signal paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10771025B1RFFE LNA topology supporting both noncontiguous intraband carrier aggregation and interband carrier aggregation
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 PSEMI CORP
  • US10771025B1 patent drawing
  • US10771025B1 patent drawing
  • US10771025B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A receiver topology for supporting various combinations of interband carrier aggregation (CA) signals, intraband non-contiguous CA and non-CA signals having different combinations of signals aggregated therein.