Split Rocker Shaft for Engine Valvetrain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current engine valvetrain systems with cylinder deactivation and variable lift technologies are complex, costly, and prone to durability issues, leading to increased engine size and weight, which complicates manufacturing and hinders fuel economy and performance improvements.

Innovation Solution

A split rocker shaft with two fluidly separate internal regions supplies independent pressurized oil to high and low lift rocker arms, enabling modular valvetrain configurations and reducing complexity and weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If independent hardware is added for cylinder deactivation and variable lift systems, then engine performance and fuel economy are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalvetrain configuration flexibilityVSAvoidvalvetrain system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines cylinder deactivation and variable lift control functions into a single integrated rocker shaft assembly. The rocker shaft includes multiple rocker arms that can be selectively positioned to achieve different valvetrain configurations (cylinder deactivation, variable lift, or both simultaneously) using one unified structure rather than separate independent hardware systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rocker shaft assembly is designed as a universal component that performs multiple functions: it provides cylinder deactivation by isolating certain cylinders, enables variable lift control through adjustable rocker arm positions, and maintains normal operation modes. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate dedicated hardware for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If add on hardware is added for cylinder deactivation and variable lift systems, then engine performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalvetrain functionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple valvetrain control functions into a single rocker shaft assembly that can be manufactured as one integrated component. This consolidation reduces the total number of parts that need to be manufactured, assembled, and quality-tested, thereby lowering manufacturing costs while maintaining enhanced valvetrain functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal rocker shaft design provides multiple valvetrain functions (cylinder deactivation, variable lift, normal operation) through a single component family, allowing for standardized manufacturing processes and reduced tooling costs compared to producing separate specialized components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If add on hardware is added for cylinder deactivation and variable lift systems, then engine performance is improved, but potential for durability issues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalvetrain control capabilityVSAvoidvalvetrain durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated rocker shaft assembly reduces the number of independent hardware interfaces and connection points compared to multiple separate add-on systems. Fewer interfaces mean fewer potential failure points, improving overall reliability and durability while maintaining advanced valvetrain control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal rocker shaft design has been engineered to handle all valvetrain functions within a single robust structure designed from the outset for durability under all operating conditions, rather than adapting separate components that may have been optimized for single functions and subjected to combined stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Use of energy by moving object

If independent systems for cylinder deactivation and variable lift are implemented, then fuel economy is improved, but valvetrain size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidcylinder head size
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functional requirements of cylinder deactivation and variable lift systems into a single compact rocker shaft assembly, eliminating the need for separate hardware packages. This integration reduces the overall volume occupied by valvetrain components in the cylinder head while maintaining the fuel economy benefits of both technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal rocker shaft design achieves multiple functions (cylinder deactivation, variable lift control) within a single component footprint, maximizing space utilization in the cylinder head and avoiding the volume penalty that would result from installing separate independent systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for a compact, cost-effective valvetrain system that adapts to various engine configurations, enhancing manufacturing flexibility and improving fuel economy and performance by reducing the need for additional hardware and weight.

Implementation Method 1

a split rocker shaft having two fluidly separate internal regions. Each of the fluidly separate internal regions is arranged to selectively carry an independent supply of pressurized oil for distribution to valvetrain components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic flow: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS7415954B2Rocker shaft arrangement for an engine
Publication Date: 2008.08.26 FCA US LLC
  • US7415954B2 patent drawing
  • US7415954B2 patent drawing
  • US7415954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rocker shaft arrangement for a valvetrain system of an engine is provided. The rocker shaft arrangement includes a split rocker shaft having two fluidly separate internal regions. Each of the fluidly separate internal regions is arranged to selectively carry an independent supply of pressurized oil for distribution to valvetrain components. The two fluidly separate regions of the split rocker shaft are each further arranged to supply pressurized oil independent of each other to one of a high lift rocker arm and a low lift rocker arm of a rocker arm assembly for an engine valvetrain system.