Split Piston Seal Ring Channels for Low-Pressure Axial Seating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing piston seal rings (PSRs) face challenges in maintaining effective sealing under varying operational conditions due to small rotational, axial, and radial displacements caused by torque, thrust loads, thermal expansion, and vibrations, leading to inefficiencies in pressure differentials and potential oil leakage.

Innovation Solution

A split ring seal design with a circumferential channel and radial channels on the axial end face, enhancing pressure-induced radial and axial contact forces to improve sealing performance, reducing the need for bias springs and simplifying installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bias springs are used to maintain sealing contact, then sealing reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the bias spring component from the sealing system. Instead of using a separate spring mechanism to maintain contact force, the design relies on the pressure differential across the piston seal ring itself to generate the necessary radial and axial contact forces against the groove sidewalls, thereby eliminating the spring while maintaining sealing reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The piston seal ring is designed to generate its own contact forces through the pressure differential across its face. The high pressure side and low pressure side create a self-generating force mechanism that pushes the seal ring against the groove surfaces, making the system self-regulating without external spring assistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple springs are used to accommodate wear and displacement, then sealing performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates multiple springs and their associated installation tools, simplifying the manufacturing and assembly process to just the piston seal ring itself, which can be directly installed into the groove without special tooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the operational parameters by allowing the piston seal ring to accommodate wear and displacement through its compliance and the pressure-induced force mechanism, replacing the need for multiple springs that would require precise manufacturing tolerances and complex assembly procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If pressure differential is increased for axial seating, then sealing force is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing forceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The piston seal ring is designed as a compliant, thin-walled component that can deform and conform to the groove surfaces. This flexibility allows it to generate adequate sealing force with lower pressure differentials compared to rigid sealing solutions, reducing the energy required for axial seating while maintaining effective sealing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The seal ring's compliance allows it to dynamically adapt to small rotational, axial, and radial displacements caused by torque loads, thrust loads, thermal expansion, and vibrations. This dynamic adaptation maintains sealing force without requiring excessive pressure differential, thereby reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new design reduces the pressure differential required for axial seating, enhances sealing forces, and minimizes complexity and tooling requirements, improving oil containment and reducing oil loss.

Implementation Method 1

In an operational condition where there is a pressure difference across the PSR, optimally, one axial end face of the PSR will bear against and seal against the adjacent sidewall face of the groove

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS12571472B2Piston seal ring
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 RTX CORP
  • US12571472B2 patent drawing
  • US12571472B2 patent drawing
  • US12571472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A split ring seal has: a first circumferential end and a second circumferential end; an inner diameter surface and an outer diameter surface; a first axial end face and a second axial end face. The outer diameter surface has a sealing surface. The first axial end face has: a first section; a second section outboard of the first section; and an axial protrusion between the first section and the second section The second axial end face has: a first sealing surface; a second sealing surface radially outboard of the first sealing surface; a circumferential channel between the first surface and the second sealing surface; and a plurality of channels extending radially outward from the circumferential channel.