Splitting Spot Breaks for Targeted Ad Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content providers face limitations in advertising revenue generation due to inflexible systems that restrict their options to a single advertisement, lacking flexibility in targeting advertisements based on user demographics and preferences.

Innovation Solution

The system dynamically splits spot breaks between two ad management servers, allowing for universal and targeted advertisements to be delivered to different proportions of consumers, with the ability to vary the order and length of ad portions based on revenue and availability, enabling more nuanced advertising strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single ad management server controls the entire spot break, then the system is simple and easy to manage, but the advertising revenue potential is limited due to lack of targeting flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising targeting flexibilityVSAvoidad management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spot break is divided into multiple segments (first portion and second portion) with different ad management servers controlling each segment. This segmentation allows independent control of universal ads in the first portion and targeted ads in the second portion, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and complexity by distributing control rather than centralizing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns different ad management servers to different portions of the spot break based on real-time conditions such as ad availability, revenue potential, and targeting requirements. This dynamic allocation enables the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If targeted advertisements are delivered to all consumers, then advertising coverage is maximized, but the ability to tailor ads to specific demographics is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemographic targeting capabilityVSAvoidad delivery coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the spot break are assigned different ad management strategies: the first portion delivers universal ads to all consumers, while the second portion delivers targeted ads to specific demographics. This local differentiation allows the system to optimize for both broad coverage and targeted engagement in different segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The audience is segmented into those who receive universal ads and those who receive targeted ads based on their position in the spot break timeline. This segmentation enables simultaneous achievement of broad coverage (first portion) and demographic targeting (second portion) without compromising either objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the spot break is split into multiple portions with different ad management servers, then advertising revenue potential increases, but the system complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadvertising revenue generationVSAvoidspot break control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spot break is segmented into controlled portions assigned to different ad management servers, enabling parallel processing of ad delivery and independent optimization of each segment. This segmentation increases productivity by allowing simultaneous ad management operations while distributing complexity across multiple manageable units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor ad performance, revenue generation, and audience engagement metrics for each portion of the spot break. This feedback enables automated adjustment of ad allocation and optimization of revenue potential while reducing manual control complexity through data-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11995689B2Split control of spot breaks
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 IHEARTMEDIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
  • US11995689B2 patent drawing
  • US11995689B2 patent drawing
  • US11995689B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transfer time, at which control of automatically inserting advertisements into a broadcast is to be passed from a first advertisement management system to a second advertisement management system, is scheduled to occur within a spot break. During a first portion of the spot break controlled by the first advertisement management system, a determination is made that playout of a final advertisement scheduled for broadcast during the first portion of the spot break cannot be completed prior to the transfer time. A run-last-spot parameter indicating whether the first advertisement management system is permitted to pass control of automatically inserting advertisements into the broadcast prior to the transfer time is obtained. Control of automatically inserting advertisements into the broadcast is conditionally passed from the first advertisement management system to the second advertisement management system based on the run-last-spot parameter.