Split Winglet Induced Drag Reduction via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft are limited by their payload capacity, range, and speed due to suboptimal aerodynamic efficiency of their components, with conventional winglets not fully addressing the need for improved aerodynamic performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a split winglet design on rotor blades and aircraft wings, featuring a leading and trailing airfoil with a shared base and a bridge, which reduces interference drag and optimizes aerodynamic loading by minimizing induced drag through a continuous, curved contour.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional single winglet is used, then the structure is simple, but the aerodynamic efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinglet structureVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The winglet is divided into two separate airfoils (leading airfoil and trailing airfoil) that are positioned at different locations along the span of the wing tip. This segmentation allows each airfoil to independently manage specific portions of the airflow and vortex structures, thereby improving aerodynamic efficiency by reducing induced drag more effectively than a single conventional winglet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If winglet size is increased to improve aerodynamic efficiency, then induced drag reduction improves, but interference drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinduced dragVSAvoidinterference drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The leading airfoil and trailing airfoil are positioned at different spanwise locations with different local characteristics. The leading airfoil is positioned to address the strong vortex at the wing tip, while the trailing airfoil is positioned to address the weaker vortex further inboard. This local optimization allows each airfoil to be sized and shaped appropriately for its specific location, reducing induced drag without excessive interference drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The dual airfoil configuration adds a spanwise dimension to the winglet design. Instead of simply increasing the size of a single winglet in the radial direction, the invention distributes aerodynamic function across two dimensions (spanwise position and radial extent), allowing independent optimization of each airfoil's contribution to drag reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of energy

If a dual airfoil configuration is used, then aerodynamic efficiency improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrag reductionVSAvoidwinglet fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The winglet is divided into two separate airfoils (leading airfoil and trailing airfoil) that are positioned at different locations along the span of the wing tip. This segmentation allows each airfoil to be manufactured and assembled independently, potentially simplifying the manufacturing process compared to creating a single complex integrated structure, while still achieving superior aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The split winglet design enhances aerodynamic efficiency by reducing induced drag, increasing lift, and decreasing fuel consumption, resulting in a 36% improvement in Lift/Drag Ratio and corresponding fuel savings of 15%-17%.

Implementation Method 1

The implementation of a split winglet design on rotor blades and aircraft wings, featuring a leading and trailing airfoil with a shared base and a bridge, which reduces interference drag and optimizes aerodynamic loading by minimizing induced drag through a continuous, curved contour.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 2

The split winglet design enhances aerodynamic efficiency by reducing induced drag, increasing lift, and decreasing fuel consumption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS10625847B2Split winglet
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • US10625847B2 patent drawing
  • US10625847B2 patent drawing
  • US10625847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A split winglet has a leading airfoil (LA) comprising a LA leading edge, a LA trailing edge, a LA upper surface, and a LA lower surface. The split winglet also has a trailing airfoil (TA) comprising a TA leading edge, a TA trailing edge, a TA upper surface, and a TA lower surface. The split winglet further has a base connected to each of the LA and the TA, the base being configured for connection to a tip of a main airfoil.