End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding Model Encoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spoken language understanding systems face inefficiencies due to large memory and storage usage from combining automatic speech recognition (ASR) and natural language understanding (NLU) models, leading to cascading issues that degrade performance and increase model size, especially when utilizing dialog history in text form.

Innovation Solution

The integration of a system that encodes both speech-based and text-based content of an utterance into a uniform representation, utilizing a hierarchical model with a lower-level encoder for speech and an upper-level encoder for text, allowing for end-to-end integration of dialogue history in spoken form without the need for text-based context during performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ASR and NLU models are combined to process dialog history in text form, then spoken language understanding capability is improved, but model size and memory usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoken language understanding capabilityVSAvoidmodel size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges ASR and NLU models into a unified end-to-end model that processes both speech and text inputs through a single architecture. This combines the functionality of separate models while sharing computational resources, thereby improving spoken language understanding without proportionally increasing model size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified model serves multiple functions: it performs both automatic speech recognition and natural language understanding, and can handle both speech-based and text-based inputs. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized models, decreasing overall system size while maintaining comprehensive capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If dialog history is integrated in text form, then context understanding is improved, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext understandingVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the input parameter representation by accepting both speech-based and text-based inputs uniformly. This allows the model to learn from multiple modalities simultaneously during training, improving context understanding while optimizing training efficiency through shared processing pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The model performs preliminary encoding of both speech and text inputs into uniform representations before processing. This preprocessing step prepares the data in an optimized format that reduces computational burden during main processing, thereby decreasing training time while maintaining comprehensive context understanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If separate ASR and NLU models are used, then modularity is maintained, but system complexity and cascading issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem architectureVSAvoidperformance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines separate ASR and NLU models into a single integrated system that processes speech and text through unified layers. This eliminates the cascading architecture where errors propagate between separate models, improving performance stability while managing complexity through a streamlined single-model structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12119008B2End-to-end integration of dialog history for spoken language understanding
Publication Date: 2024.10.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12119008B2 patent drawing
  • US12119008B2 patent drawing
  • US12119008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, computer-implemented methods, and computer program products to facilitate end to end integration of dialogue history for spoken language understanding are provided. According to an embodiment, a system can comprise a processor that executes components stored in memory. The computer executable components comprise a conversation component that encodes speech-based content of an utterance and text-based content of the utterance into a uniform representation.