Real-Time Spoken LLM Conversations With Sentiment-Based Style Cues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing large language models are primarily interacted with through text inputs, limiting their applications and user accessibility, particularly intimidating non-technical users and restricting interactions to text-based contexts.

Innovation Solution

A natural language interface is introduced, enabling spoken conversations by analyzing user speech inputs for sentiment and using a prompt engine to inform responses from the large language model, incorporating style cues to enhance the conversational experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If text input interface is used for large language models, then interaction precision is maintained, but user accessibility and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser accessibilityVSAvoidinteraction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces speech-to-text translation as an intermediary component that converts spoken language into text format. This mediator enables non-technical users to interact naturally through speech while the system processes and analyzes the input as text, maintaining the precision required by the large language model. The intermediary bridges the gap between casual speech input and structured text processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical keyboard typing system with an acoustic speech recognition system. Instead of requiring physical keyboard interaction, users can speak naturally to the system. The speech-to-text translation component captures acoustic signals and converts them into text, substituting the mechanical input method with an acoustic-based method that is more accessible to non-technical users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If text-only interaction modality is used, then system complexity is reduced, but adaptability and versatility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication scopeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the system multi-functional by supporting both text input and speech input modalities. The large language model can process both written text and transcribed speech, enabling it to serve diverse user groups including those who prefer or need speech-based interaction. This universality allows the same core system to adapt to different interaction preferences and application scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the interaction system into distinct functional modules: speech-to-text translation, sentiment analysis, and large language model processing. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in its specific function while working together as an integrated system. The modular architecture manages complexity by breaking down the overall system into manageable, independent components that can be developed and maintained separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If sentiment analysis and style cues are added to enhance conversational experience, then user experience is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversational experienceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing sentiment analysis on the user's speech input before generating the response. The system analyzes the sentiment of the input speech, determines the appropriate emotional tone, and prepares style cues in advance. This preliminary sentiment analysis allows the large language model to generate responses that are not only contextually appropriate but also emotionally aligned with the user's state, enhancing the conversational experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the sentiment analysis results to influence the style and tone of the generated response. The system continuously monitors user sentiment and adjusts its communication style accordingly, creating a dynamic feedback loop. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt its behavior based on user emotional state, making conversations more natural and engaging while managing complexity through focused sentiment-based adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12437746B2Real-time system for spoken natural stylistic conversations with large language models
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12437746B2 patent drawing
  • US12437746B2 patent drawing
  • US12437746B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The techniques disclosed herein enable systems for spoken natural stylistic conversations with large language models. In contrast to many existing modalities for interacting with large language models that are limited to text, the techniques presented herein enable users to carry a fully spoken conversation with a large language model. This is accomplished by converting a user speech audio input to text and utilizing a prompt engine to analyze a sentiment expressed by the user. A large language model, having been trained on example conversations, by generating a text response as well as a style cue to express emotion in response to the sentiment expressed by speech audio input. A text-to-speech engine can subsequently interpret the text response and style cue to generate an audio output which emulates the sensation of human conversation.