Spool Sleeve Valve Layout for Subsea Cavitation Wear Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cavitation in valves used in subsea environments leads to wear of valve components, affecting performance and making maintenance challenging due to hazardous and remote locations, especially when using water-glycol as a fire-resistant fluid which increases cavitation likelihood.

Innovation Solution

The design of a valve with anti-cavitation features, including a spool and sleeve configuration with flow restrictions downstream of seating regions, which reduces the likelihood of cavitation bubble formation and forces implosion away from critical components, thereby minimizing wear and maintenance needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional valve design is used in subsea environments with water-glycol fluid, then the valve can operate in hazardous locations, but cavitation occurs causing wear of valve components and affecting performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve performance stabilityVSAvoidcavitation wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is segmented into multiple functional zones: a first cavity for initial fluid reception, a second cavity with flow restrictions for pressure control, and a third cavity for final discharge. This segmentation allows progressive pressure management to prevent cavitation while maintaining operational reliability in subsea environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Flow restriction elements are strategically placed at specific locations within the second cavity where pressure differential is most critical. This localized quality enhancement creates controlled pressure gradients that prevent cavitation formation at critical seating surfaces while allowing efficient fluid flow elsewhere in the valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If valve components are replaced to restore performance, then proper performance level is restored, but maintenance becomes challenging due to hazardous and remote subsea locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve performance restorationVSAvoidmaintenance accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The valve incorporates anti-cavitation features and protective design elements during manufacturing that prevent wear before it occurs. This beforehand protection reduces the frequency and need for maintenance interventions in remote subsea locations, as the valve is designed to resist cavitation damage from the outset rather than requiring periodic repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If flow rate is increased through the valve, then productivity improves, but pressure differential increases causing cavitation bubble formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow rateVSAvoidcavitation bubble formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fluid flow path is divided into multiple stages across three cavities, with flow restriction elements distributed throughout. This segmentation allows high overall flow rates while maintaining controlled pressure gradients at each stage, preventing the sudden pressure differentials that cause cavitation even during high-productivity operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The valve design changes the pressure parameters progressively through the flow path using restricted flow areas. By controlling the pressure differential at each stage rather than allowing a single large drop, the valve maintains high flow rates while keeping pressure changes within cavitation-free parameters throughout the fluid path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces cavitation-related wear, enhancing valve durability and reducing maintenance costs by preventing implosion-induced damage at critical seating surfaces, thus improving the reliability and longevity of subsea equipment.

Implementation Method 1

a flow restriction disposed downstream of the gap, wherein when the valve is actuated, fluid is allowed to flow from the supply port through the first opening and the gap and through the flow restriction prior to flowing through the second opening to the operating port; such that the flow restriction generates an increased pressure level at the gap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow restriction:

Implementation Method 2

spool mounted within the second longitudinal cavity and configured to move axially therein, wherein the spool is configured to be seated on the seat of the sleeve when the valve is unactuated, and wherein when the valve is actuated, the spool moves within the second longitudinal cavity such that a gap is formed at the seat between an exterior peripheral surface of the spool and the interior peripheral surface of the sleeve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAxial movement:

Data Source

PatentUS11480200B2Valve with anti-cavitation features
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 PARKER INTANGIBLES LLC
  • US11480200B2 patent drawing
  • US11480200B2 patent drawing
  • US11480200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example valve includes: (i) a valve body comprising a supply port and an operating port; (ii) a sleeve comprising a first opening fluidly coupled to the supply port, a second opening fluidly coupled to the operating port, and a seat; (in) a spool configured to move axially within the sleeve, wherein the spool is configured to he seated on the seat of the sleeve when the valve is unactuated, and wherein when the valve is actuated, the spool moves such that a gap is formed at the seat; and (iv) a flow restriction disposed downstream of the gap, wherein when the valve is actuated, fluid is allowed to flow from the supply port through the first opening and the gap and through die flow′ restriction prior to flowing through the second opening to the operating port, such that the flow restriction generates an increased pressure level at the gap.