Sporting Event Wager Recommendations Using Followed-User Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sporting event wagering systems require users to manually select and input multiple complex parameters for placing bets, leading to increased user error and machine wear due to incorrect inputs, especially for novice users.

Innovation Solution

A system that recommends sporting event wagers based on attributes of the user and a followed user, automating the selection process by weighing multiple data points to identify and display suitable wagers with reduced user inputs, thereby reducing errors and extending machine lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If users manually select and input multiple complex parameters for placing bets, then the system allows complete user control and customization, but user error increases and machine wear increases due to incorrect inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of placing wagerVSAvoiduser error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables users to follow other users and automatically receive wager recommendations without manual parameter selection. The followed user's wager selections are automatically transmitted to the following user, eliminating the need for the following user to manually input complex betting parameters while reducing errors through automated data transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism where a followed user acts as a mediator between the wagering system and the following user. The followed user's expertise and selections serve as an intermediate layer that simplifies the betting process for the following user, reducing the complexity of manual parameter selection and minimizing input errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If users manually input multiple complex parameters, then the system provides comprehensive wagering options, but machine wear increases due to frequent incorrect inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewagering optionsVSAvoidmachine lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to automatically receive and place wagers based on followed users' selections without manual intervention. This self-service approach maintains comprehensive wagering options through the diversity of followed users' selections while significantly reducing machine wear by eliminating repeated manual input operations and incorrect entries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-selecting wagers based on followed users' expertise and historical performance. This preliminary selection process reduces the need for following users to manually input parameters, thereby decreasing the frequency of incorrect inputs and extending machine lifespan while preserving versatile wagering options through the pre-curated selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the system automates wager selection by weighing multiple data points, then user error decreases and ease of operation improves, but the complexity of the recommendation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of placing wagerVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the complex data weighing and analysis functions into a separate recommendation engine that operates independently. The core wagering interface remains simple for users, while the extracted recommendation system handles the complexity of weighing multiple data points including user preferences, followed user performance, and wager parameters in the background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a recommendation intermediary that sits between the user and the complex wagering parameters. This intermediary automatically processes multiple data points and presents simplified wager recommendations to users, maintaining ease of operation while managing system complexity through the intermediary layer that handles the sophisticated analysis transparently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If the system requires multiple user inputs for wager placement, then wagering precision and user control are maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewager selection accuracyVSAvoidtime to place wager
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary wager selection and validation based on followed users' expertise and historical accuracy. This preliminary action pre-processes the wagering decision, maintaining selection accuracy through the followed user's proven judgment while significantly reducing the time required for the following user to place the wager by eliminating manual parameter selection and validation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12374189B2Sporting event wagering recommendations
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12374189B2 patent drawing
  • US12374189B2 patent drawing
  • US12374189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that causes an automatic publication of one or more sporting event wagers to a user based on zero, one or more attributes of that user, and zero, one or more attributes of another user.