Spot Block Reinsertion for Revenue Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In media broadcasting, under-filled spot blocks can occur when priority spots are removed, leading to revenue loss and requiring complex coordination between media automation and traffic systems to reinsert bumped spots, especially across different broadcast channels.

Innovation Solution

A system and method where the media automation system identifies under-filled spot blocks and requests priority spots from the traffic and billing system, which collects and ranks available bumped spots for reinsertion, ensuring timely and automated filling of empty slots to recover lost revenue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If priority spots are removed from spot blocks, then scheduling flexibility is improved, but revenue is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling flexibilityVSAvoidrevenue loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying under-filled spot blocks and pre-ranking available bumped spots before the actual reinsertion process. The media automation system proactively identifies which spot blocks need filling and the traffic and billing system pre-ranks potential spots to be reinserted, ensuring that when reinsertion occurs, the process is efficient and revenue-maximizing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the media automation system notifies the traffic and billing system about under-filled spot blocks, and the traffic and billing system responds with ranked lists of available bumped spots. This closed-loop feedback ensures that revenue loss is minimized by systematically matching available spots with under-filled blocks across different broadcast channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual coordination is used to reinsert bumped spots, then scheduling precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the media automation system automatically identifies under-filled spot blocks and the traffic and billing system automatically provides ranked lists of available bumped spots. The reinsertion process is automated without requiring manual coordination, reducing system complexity while maintaining scheduling precision through algorithmic decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces standardized communication protocols as intermediaries between the media automation system and traffic and billing system. These protocols enable automated information exchange about under-filled blocks and available spots, allowing precise scheduling coordination without direct manual intervention and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated reinsertion is implemented, then productivity is improved, but reliability may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereinsertion efficiencyVSAvoidscheduling reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the media automation system notifies the traffic and billing system about under-filled spot blocks, and the traffic and billing system responds with ranked lists of available bumped spots. This closed-loop feedback ensures that automated reinsertion is reliable by continuously verifying availability and matching criteria before reinsertion occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification by pre-identifying under-filled spot blocks and pre-ranking available bumped spots based on predetermined criteria before actual reinsertion. This preliminary action ensures that the automated process maintains reliability by only attempting reinsertions that are pre-validated as feasible and revenue-positive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9203537B2Managing under-filled spot blocks
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 IHEARTMEDIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
  • US9203537B2 patent drawing
  • US9203537B2 patent drawing
  • US9203537B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Changes to spot blocks to be broadcast via terrestrial stations can cause paid spots to be removed from corresponding spot blocks on a streaming station. If the streaming station has other spot blocks that are under-filled, the bumped spots can be automatically placed in under-filled spot blocks, allowing the bumped to be placed in an under-filled spot block faster than if human intervention was required. A media traffic system can keep track of the bumped spots, and in response to a request by a media automation system, provide a list of potential spots available for inclusion in the under-filled spot blocks. The automation system selects desired spots for placement in under-filled spot blocks, and notifies the traffic system about which potential spots have been placed. The traffic system removes the spots from its list of available spots to prevent selected spots from being included in future responses.