Resistance Spot Welding Holding Time Control for Crack Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resistance spot welding methods for high-strength steel sheets with surface treatments, such as galvanized layers, face issues with liquid metal embrittlement (LME) and cold cracking in the weld heat affected zone, particularly due to complex factors involving alloy elements, surface states, and welding operation disturbances, which are not adequately addressed by current techniques.

Innovation Solution

A resistance spot welding method that optimizes the electrode holding time based on the composition and surface state of the steel sheets, including the contents of alloy elements like C, Si, and Mn, as well as the thickness of the decarburized layer and internal oxidation, while considering welding operation disturbances, to prevent both LME and cold cracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If resistance spot welding is applied to high-strength steel sheets with surface treatments, then welding productivity is improved, but LME cracking and cold cracking occur in the weld heat affected zone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding productivityVSAvoidweld quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the temporal parameter of electrode holding time after current application to prevent cracking. By optimizing the holding time based on steel sheet composition and surface state, the method resolves the contradiction between maintaining high welding productivity and preventing LME/cold cracking in the heat affected zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary analysis of steel sheet composition (alloy elements C, Si, Mn) and surface state (decarburized layer thickness, internal oxidation) before welding to determine the appropriate electrode holding time. This preliminary characterization enables prevention of cracking before it occurs, while maintaining efficient welding productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If electrode holding time is extended to prevent LME cracking, then weld reliability improves, but welding cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack preventionVSAvoidwelding cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the electrode holding time parameter to the minimum necessary duration to prevent cracking, rather than using excessive holding times. By basing the holding time on specific steel sheet characteristics, it achieves crack prevention with minimal time extension, balancing reliability improvement with productivity maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention makes the electrode holding time dynamic rather than fixed, adjusting it based on the specific composition and surface state of each steel sheet. This dynamic adjustment ensures sufficient holding time for crack prevention while minimizing unnecessary time extension for each welding cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If welding current is increased to improve weld strength, then joint strength improves, but LME cracking risk increases due to molten coating penetration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidLME cracking risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary characterization of the steel sheet surface state including coating thickness and composition before welding. This allows determination of appropriate welding parameters that achieve sufficient joint strength while preventing molten coating penetration and LME cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimized electrode holding time acts as an intermediary parameter that mediates between the need for high welding current (for joint strength) and the risk of LME cracking. By controlling the holding time after current application, it allows high current welding while preventing harmful molten metal penetration during the cooling phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces LME and cold cracking by controlling the pressure holding time after current application, ensuring stable welds in high-strength steel sheets with surface treatments, regardless of their strength or assembly conditions.

Implementation Method 1

passing a high welding current between the upper and lower electrodes for a short period of time while pressing the steel sheets with the welding electrodes, thereby joining the steel sheets together. This method utilizes resistance heat, generated by applying a high welding current to the steel sheets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistance heat: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

a portion where the two overlapping steel sheets have melted in an area of contact between the steel sheets upon application of current to the steel sheets, and the melt has then solidified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

tensile stress due to thermal expansion or contraction of steel sheets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion and contraction: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 4

A metal coating layer having a low melting point on the surface of a steel sheet melts during welding. When the pressure of welding electrodes or tensile stress due to thermal expansion or contraction of steel sheets is applied to a weld, the molten low-melting metal penetrates into the grain boundaries of the base material of the surface-treated steel sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid metal embrittlement:

Implementation Method 5

the molten low-melting metal penetrates into the grain boundaries of the base material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 6

holding the welding electrodes after completion of the application of current, wherein in the holding step, a pressure holding time H satisfies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 7

the melt has then solidified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentEP4663332A1Resistance spot welding method and method for manufacturing welded member
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 JFE STEEL CORP
  • EP4663332A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4663332A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4663332A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention is directed to the provision of a resistance spot welding method and a method for producing a welded member. The present invention provides a resistance spot welding method for joining a plurality of steel sheets together by clamping a sheet assembly, consisting of the plurality of overlapping steel sheets, between a pair of welding electrodes, and applying a current to the sheet assembly while applying pressure thereon, the method including a holding step of holding the welding electrodes after completion of the application of current. In the holding step, a pressure holding time is controlled within a predetermined time range defined by a particular relational expression using the C content, the Si content, and the Mn content of a steel sheet, the thickness of a decarburized layer per one surface of the steel sheet, and the amount of internal oxidation per one surface of the steel sheet.