Spot Welding Electrode Position Tracking for Defect Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current welding quality inspection methods, particularly in the automotive industry, face challenges with destructive testing that poses safety risks, incurs high costs, and is time-consuming, while non-destructive methods require significant investment and struggle to detect spatter and welding defects effectively.

Innovation Solution

A welding quality inspection apparatus and method that utilizes a position detection unit to generate position data based on the welding gun's electrode positions, comparing first and second position data to reference data to determine defectiveness, without the need for additional devices, thereby reducing costs and improving defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If destructive inspection is used to check welding quality, then welding defects can be detected, but safety risks increase and time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding defect detectionVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical destructive separation method with an electromagnetic sensing method. The welding inspection apparatus uses a sensor to detect changes in magnetic flux caused by welding defects, eliminating the need for physical separation and force application. This substitution of mechanical inspection with electromagnetic field-based detection resolves the contradiction by maintaining defect detection capability while eliminating safety risks associated with destructive testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If non-destructive inspection methods like laser, ultrasonic sensors are used, then safety risk is reduced, but investment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety risk reductionVSAvoidinvestment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the welding inspection apparatus multi-functional by integrating it with an existing welding robot system. The inspection apparatus uses the welding robot's movement and existing sensors to perform both welding operations and quality inspection. This universality allows the system to perform non-destructive inspection without requiring separate expensive laser or ultrasonic sensing equipment, thereby reducing investment cost while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional non-destructive methods are used, then safety is improved, but defect detection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidspatter and welding defect detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by positioning the inspection sensor very close to the welding area, specifically at a predetermined distance from the welding gun. This localized positioning allows the sensor to detect subtle magnetic flux changes caused by spatter and welding defects that remote sensing methods would miss. The sensor is strategically placed to focus detection capability on the critical welding zone, improving defect detection precision while maintaining safety through non-contact measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If destructive inspection is used, then welding quality can be determined, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding quality determinationVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous inspection by integrating the sensing apparatus with the welding robot's movement. The sensor continuously monitors magnetic flux changes during the welding process itself, rather than performing separate inspection steps after welding completes. This continuity allows welding quality determination to occur in real-time during manufacturing, eliminating time loss associated with post-welding destructive testing while maintaining accurate defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11660707B2Welding quality inspection apparatus and method of the same
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11660707B2 patent drawing
  • US11660707B2 patent drawing
  • US11660707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A welding quality inspection apparatus for inspecting the welding quality of a plurality of welding parts formed on the material through the upper electrode and the lower electrode of the welding gun includes a position detection unit for detecting a position of the upper electrode, a control unit generating a position table based on a signal detected by the position detection unit during a total welding time of welding the plurality of welding parts of the material, generating first position data for a first welding time and second position data for a second welding time of a spot welding time of each of the welding parts based on the position table, checking whether the welding parts are defective by using the first position data, the second position data, and reference data, and generating result data based on whether the welding parts are detective, and an output unit for outputting the result data.