Ergonomic Spray Actuator Trigger With Changing Moment Arm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spray actuators are not ergonomically designed to accommodate a range of user sizes and operating styles, leading to inefficiencies and user fatigue when dispensing different compositions, as the design parameters such as piston bore, stroke length, and trigger articulation may not align with individual user capabilities.

Innovation Solution

The ergonomic spray actuator features a housing with a narrowed waist portion that comfortably fits the user's thumb and forefinger, allowing for easier grip and reduced pressure on the fingers and wrist, along with a trigger design that can be actuated using multiple fingers and includes zones with a changing moment arm to reduce fatigue, enabling consistent operation across various user sizes and compositions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the piston bore is increased to improve dispensing volume, then the force necessary to achieve proper trigger stroke becomes too great for a particular user, but reducing the piston bore reduces dispensing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing volumeVSAvoidtrigger stroke force
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger is designed with multiple zones of different lengths along its stroke path, allowing the moment arm to dynamically change during operation. This enables the actuator to adapt to different user strengths while maintaining adequate dispensing volume, as the varying moment arm provides mechanical advantage adjustment during the trigger stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If the piston stroke is increased to improve dispensing volume, then the user may not pull the trigger for the entire intended path length due to hand size limitations, but reducing the piston stroke reduces dispensing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing volumeVSAvoidtrigger stroke completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger incorporates multiple zones with varying lengths that create a dynamic moment arm effect. This allows users with different hand sizes to comfortably complete the full trigger stroke, as the changing moment arm provides progressive mechanical advantage that accommodates varying user capabilities while ensuring complete piston stroke for adequate dispensing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger design changes the moment arm parameter along its stroke path, with different zones having different lengths. This parameter variation allows the actuator to accommodate different user hand sizes and strengths, ensuring that all users can complete the full trigger stroke while maintaining consistent dispensing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If the trigger articulation is increased to improve mechanical advantage, then the user may not pull the trigger for the entire intended path length due to hand fatigue, but reducing the trigger articulation reduces mechanical advantage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidtrigger stroke completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The trigger is designed with multiple zones that create a dynamic moment arm, allowing mechanical advantage to vary during the stroke. This dynamic design provides sufficient mechanical advantage in the later zones where users need it most, while keeping the overall trigger length manageable to prevent hand fatigue, enabling complete stroke completion for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If the actuator is designed for full trigger strokes at particular stroke speed, then the spray characteristics are optimized, but the user may operate the trigger slower or faster than intended leading to inconsistent spray

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray characteristic consistencyVSAvoidoperational variability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic moment arm design with multiple trigger zones provides progressive mechanical advantage that compensates for variations in user stroke speed. This allows users to operate the trigger at their natural pace while still achieving consistent spray characteristics, as the changing moment arm automatically adjusts the force application throughout the stroke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The trigger design incorporates parameter changes in the form of varying zone lengths that modify the moment arm. This parameter variation compensates for user-operated speed variations, ensuring that spray characteristics remain consistent regardless of whether the user pulls the trigger quickly or slowly, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining spray precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3612319B1Ergonomic spray actuator, a sprayer comprising the ergonomic spray actuator, and a method of freshening the air or fabric
Publication Date: 2021.05.26 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP3612319B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3612319B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3612319B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An actuator includes a nozzle; a valve; and a trigger (28) operatively connected with the valve, wherein the trigger comprises an elastomeric material, wherein the trigger is configured to reciprocate from a forward position to a rearward position and back to a forward position upon actuation, wherein upon actuation from a forward position to a rearward position the trigger comprises a changing moment arm.