Spray Boom Control for Uniform Nozzle Distance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wide spray booms on agricultural machinery face challenges in maintaining consistent nozzle-to-ground distance over uneven terrain, leading to uneven coverage and increased risk of spray drift due to air movements, as existing solutions lack sufficient flexibility and precision in adapting to varying soil contours.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for controlling the movement of a spray boom, featuring a pivotally mounted spreading rod with controllable adjusting devices and sensors to maintain consistent nozzle distance from the ground, switching between force-free and defined actuating modes based on terrain conditions to ensure uniform application, using sensors to detect vehicle inclination and ground surface variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the spray boom is made wide to increase working width, then productivity increases, but the distance from nozzles to ground becomes uneven leading to poor application quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking widthVSAvoidnozzle-to-ground distance uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The spray boom is divided into multiple independently controllable segments (central section and lateral extension arms) that can be adjusted separately to maintain uniform nozzle-to-ground distance across the entire width, resolving the contradiction between wide coverage and uniform application precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spray boom transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamic system with active control, where sensors detect terrain variations and actuators continuously adjust segment positions in real-time to maintain constant nozzle-to-ground distance despite terrain undulations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the spray boom is elevated to reduce ground contact risk, then reliability improves, but spray drift increases due to air movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground contact preventionVSAvoidspray drift
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spray boom employs active dynamic control to maintain optimal nozzle-to-ground distance by adapting to terrain contours in real-time, preventing ground contact while minimizing elevation-induced drift through continuous position adjustment rather than static high positioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors provide continuous feedback on nozzle-to-ground distance and terrain conditions, enabling the control system to adjust boom position dynamically to maintain reliable operation at optimal height without excessive elevation that would cause drift

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If passive segmentation is used to allow boom flexibility, then adaptability to terrain improves, but additional supporting elements are required increasing device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptationVSAvoidsupporting elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single active control mechanism that both positions boom segments and provides terrain adaptation, eliminating the need for separate passive supporting elements while achieving terrain following capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces passive mechanical supporting elements with an active control system using sensors and actuators that provide terrain adaptation through electronic control rather than mechanical structures, reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Strength

If the boom is rigidly mounted to maintain structural stability, then strength improves, but the ability to adapt to uneven ground decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidground contour adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The boom is segmented into multiple independent sections that can be controlled separately, allowing the structure to maintain overall rigidity while individual segments adapt to terrain variations, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and terrain adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static rigid structure to a dynamically controllable segmented structure that maintains structural integrity while actively adapting segment positions to follow terrain contours through real-time control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3219187B1Moveable device for dispensing fluid and/or solid substances and method for controlling the device
Publication Date: 2023.10.04 HORSCH LEEB APPL SYST
  • EP3219187B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3219187B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3219187B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and a mobile device for controlling and/or regulating the motion of a dispensing device (9) for dispensing liquid and/or solid active ingredients, which comprises a dispensing boom (12) mounted on a self-propelled or towed vehicle (10) and pivotably mounted about a suspension point (30) approximately parallel to a direction of travel (14). The boom has a central section (34) and lateral extension arms (36). The central section (34) is coupled via at least one adjustable actuating device (40) to a superstructure or frame section (11) and/or to a rigidly or movably mounted support section (13) of the vehicle (10).In a first operating mode, the actuating device (40) establishes a largely force-free mechanical connection in which the spreading boom (12) is largely decoupled from torques about the pivot axis through the suspension point (30) resulting from vehicle movements (26) about the vehicle's longitudinal axis (28). Furthermore, in a second operating mode, or adjustment mode, the actuating device transmits a defined actuating force and/or a defined actuating torque between the central section (34) and the support, superstructure, or frame section (13, 11) to pivot the spreading boom (12) relative to the support section (13), superstructure, or frame (11), largely independent of disturbances resulting from vehicle movements.The adjustable actuator is coupled to at least one sensor element (54, 54a, 54b, 54c) assigned to the vehicle (20) and detecting its body movements, the output signals (56) of which are used or processed to control the actuator (40).