Spray Boom Motion Control for Symmetric Ground-Following Guidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural spray booms with large working widths face issues of uneven spray distribution due to variable distances from the ground, leading to spray agent drift and uneven coverage, especially with asymmetrical movement of lateral booms and torque imbalances.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling the movement of spray booms that ensures symmetrical pivoting of lateral booms relative to a central section, using actuators and coupling elements to adjust to ground contours, allowing for both autonomous and manual control to avoid obstacles and maintain consistent boom positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the spray boom is made wider to increase working width, then productivity increases, but the distance from nozzles to ground becomes uneven leading to spray agent drift

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking widthVSAvoidspray agent drift
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The spray boom is designed with laterally movable booms that can dynamically adjust their position laterally and in height. This dynamic capability allows the boom to maintain optimal distance from the ground across its entire working width, preventing spray agent drift while preserving the increased productivity from the wider boom configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of boom position (lateral and vertical) in response to detected ground conditions. By actively adjusting these parameters, the system maintains consistent spray application quality across the full working width without suffering from the drift problems that would result from fixed boom positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the spray boom is raised higher to avoid obstacles, then reliability improves, but uneven coverage of the field with spray agent occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidanceVSAvoidspray coverage uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The spray boom is divided into multiple independently controllable booms (at least three booms). This segmentation allows each boom to be adjusted independently in height and lateral position, enabling the system to clear obstacles on one side while maintaining proper spray coverage on the other sides by adjusting individual boom positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different booms or sections of the boom can have different height and lateral positions tailored to local ground conditions and obstacle locations. This local quality adjustment ensures that each section of the spray boom operates at the optimal height for its specific location, maintaining spray coverage uniformity while avoiding obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If hydraulic cylinders are used to pivot the boom arms, then adaptability to ground relief improves, but asymmetrical movement of arms occurs due to uneven cylinder movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground relief adaptationVSAvoidboom symmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect the position and movement of each boom arm, and this feedback information is used by the control system to adjust hydraulic cylinder operation. This closed-loop control ensures that boom arms move symmetrically and maintain proper relative positions even when adapting to varying ground relief conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hydraulic system is designed with a central control unit that coordinates multiple hydraulic cylinders to work together as an integrated system. This universal control approach allows the same control logic to manage both symmetric and asymmetric boom movements, maintaining stability while adapting to ground conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If the boom is guided parallel to the ground surface, then spray distribution uniformity improves, but the system cannot adapt to ground contours or relief

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray distribution uniformityVSAvoidground contour adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The boom system transitions from static parallel guidance to dynamic adaptive guidance. The booms can actively change their height and lateral position in response to detected ground contours, maintaining optimal spray distribution uniformity while adapting to varying terrain conditions through real-time position adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors detect ground contour and relief conditions, providing feedback to the control system. This feedback enables the system to automatically adjust boom positions to follow ground contours while maintaining uniform spray distribution, combining the benefits of both parallel guidance and ground adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3797588B1Method for motion control, and/or regulation of an agricultural distribution device
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 HORSCH LEEB APPLICATION SYSTEMS SE & CO KG
  • EP3797588B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3797588B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3797588B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for position-controlled guidance of at least two pivotable boom arms (28, 28-1, 28-2) of an agricultural spreading machine (10) across a ground surface, wherein the relative position of the at least two pivotable boom arms (28, 28-1, 28-2) to the ground surface is detected, and depending on the detected relative position, the at least two boom arms (28, 28-1, 28-2) are realigned by means of a pivoting movement to the ground surface within the framework of an autonomous control system. The method provides that the autonomous control for at least one of the at least two pivotable boom arms (28, 28-1, 28-2) is temporarily interrupted, and the positioning of the at least one of the at least two pivotable boom arms (28, 28-1, 28-2) is manually controlled during the interruption.