Spray Bottle Safety Top with Nested Child-Resistant Caps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing liquid dispensing systems, particularly small atomizers, lack effective mechanisms to prevent accidental or unauthorized access by minors, failing to meet child-resistant packaging regulations and posing safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A cylindrical spray bottle design featuring an outer cap with resilient vanes and an interior cap that engages with a spray nozzle, secured by detaining bumps and L-shaped protrusions, along with a locking actuator mechanism that requires intentional rotation to dispense liquid, ensuring secure closure during shipping and use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a simple cap design is used, then ease of manufacture and ease of operation are improved, but child-resistant capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidchild-resistant capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap assembly is divided into multiple functional components: an outer cap with detaining bumps for child-resistant closure, an interior cap with vanes for actuator engagement, and a locking mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function while collectively providing child-resistant capability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interior cap is nested within the outer cap, with the interior cap sliding along the length of the outer cap. The detaining bumps on the outer cap engage with protrusions on the interior cap to secure the assembly. This nested structure provides child-resistant capability while maintaining a compact form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added to prevent accidental dispensing, then child-resistant capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild-resistant capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detaining bumps are pre-positioned on the outer cap to engage with corresponding protrusions on the interior cap, creating a locked state that prevents accidental dispensing. The locking mechanism is built into the structure rather than added as a separate component, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism operates automatically through the interaction between the detaining bumps and protrusions. When the interior cap is inserted into the outer cap, the bumps engage with the protrusions to secure the assembly without requiring additional locking actions or complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the interior cap is made removable for cleaning access, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of child-resistant capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidchild-resistant capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interior cap is designed to slide along the length of the outer cap, providing dynamic access for cleaning while maintaining secure engagement during normal use. The detaining bumps remain engaged with the protrusions throughout the sliding motion, preserving child-resistant capability even when the interior cap is partially removed for cleaning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively deters access to harmful substances by minors while allowing easy use by adults, meeting regulatory standards for child-resistant packaging and preventing unintentional dispensing.

Implementation Method 1

12 vanes extending distally towards an axis shared with the outer cap, wherein the vanes are resilient and engage with a spray nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the interior cap is free to slide along the length of the outer cap but does not slide out of the outer cap due to four detaining bumps on the outer cap, and wherein the interior cap engages with four L-shaped protrusions such that the four bumps lock with the protrusions to secure the cap to the main body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS20250249471A1Safety top for spray bottle
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 BUCK JEREMIAH J
  • US20250249471A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249471A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249471A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention may comprise a bottle with a top including an interior cap with 12 vanes extending distally towards an axis shared with an outer cap. The plastic cap's vanes are resilient, engaging with a spray nozzle. The interior cap is free to slide or “wiggle” along the length of the outer cap but does not slide out of the outer cap due to four detaining bumps. The outer cap, with the interior cap installed, engages with four L-shaped protrusions such that the four bumps lock with the protrusions to lock the cap to the main body of the cylindrical spray bottle, preventing access to the spray nozzle actuator. This device is designed to deter access to harmful or controlled substances delivered by the spray nozzle by children.