Spray Chamber Apparatus for Uniform Agar Plate Inoculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual inoculation of agar plates using streaking or spreading techniques is time-consuming, prone to uneven spreading, and can damage the agar surface, leading to failed experiments and inefficiencies in microbial distribution.

Innovation Solution

A spray chamber apparatus with an atomizer system that atomizes the microbial suspension for uniform inoculation of agar plates, preventing cross-contamination and surface damage, allowing for quick and efficient inoculation of multiple plates without external contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual spreading or streaking technique is used, then inoculation can be performed with simple equipment, but the process is time-consuming and requires a lot of attention and care

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinoculation speedVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical spreading/streaking operations with an automated spray system that uses compressed gas to atomize and distribute microbial inoculum across the agar surface, eliminating the need for manual manipulation while significantly increasing inoculation speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The spray system is designed to be self-regulating, where the atomized spray pattern and distribution are automatically controlled by the compressed gas flow and chamber geometry, reducing the need for operator attention and care during the inoculation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual streaking or spreading is used, then equipment is simple, but uneven spreading and discontinuous streaking occur leading to failed experiments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobial distribution uniformityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical spreading/streaking operations with an automated spray system that uses compressed gas to atomize and distribute microbial inoculum across the agar surface, eliminating the need for manual manipulation while significantly increasing inoculation speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the inoculum delivery from liquid/drop form to atomized spray form, creating a fine mist of droplets that distribute more uniformly across the agar surface compared to manual spreading techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If wire loop, glass spreader, or cotton swab is used, then inoculation can be performed, but the surface of the solidified agar media is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagar surface damageVSAvoidinoculation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces contact-based mechanical tools (wire loops, spreaders, swabs) with a non-contact spray system that delivers atomized inoculum through compressed gas, eliminating physical contact with the agar surface and preventing damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces compressed gas as an intermediary medium to transport and deposit the microbial inoculum onto the agar surface without requiring direct contact between the inoculum source and the agar, thereby preventing surface damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Area of stationary object

If L-shaped spreader is used, then inoculation can be performed, but culture does not reach the inner peripheral areas of the agar plate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagar plate coverage areaVSAvoidinoculation operation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inoculum delivery into atomized droplets that can be dispersed throughout the chamber and reach all areas of the agar plate including inner peripheries, eliminating the need for manual manipulation to reach difficult areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state of the inoculum delivery from liquid/drop form to atomized spray form, creating a fine mist of droplets that distribute more uniformly across the agar surface including peripheral areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Manufacturing precision

If microbial inoculum is applied manually, then inoculation can be performed, but condensed colonies form in the center of the plate which cannot be distinguished properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolony distribution uniformityVSAvoidexperiment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of the inoculum delivery from liquid/drop form to atomized spray form, creating a fine mist of droplets that distribute more uniformly across the agar surface including peripheral areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical spreading/streaking operations with an automated spray system that uses compressed gas to atomize and distribute microbial inoculum across the agar surface, eliminating the need for manual manipulation while significantly increasing inoculation speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus ensures uniform microbial distribution across the agar surface, reducing experiment time and preventing contamination, while maintaining the integrity of the agar surface, achieving comparable results to manual methods in antimicrobial susceptibility tests.

Implementation Method 1

an atomized microbial suspension may be sprayed through the upper opening of the spray chamber and onto the agar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization:

Implementation Method 2

A containment feature extends around an inner surface of the spray chamber to catch any drops that may form on its inner wall and advance down towards the lower opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10379016B1Apparatus for inoculating agar plate
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 KING SAUD UNIVERSITY
  • US10379016B1 patent drawing
  • US10379016B1 patent drawing
  • US10379016B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The apparatus for inoculating agar plates includes a spray chamber having an upper opening for receiving an atomized microbial suspension and a lower opening for receiving an agar plate. The apparatus also includes an atomizer including a reservoir and a fluid tube for delivering the microbial suspension to the atomizer nozzle. A containment feature extends around an inner surface of the spray chamber to catch any drop that may form on its inner wall and advance down towards the lower opening. The spray chamber allows multiple agar plates to be quickly inoculated without cross-contamination of agar habitats, without contaminating the outside of the plates, and without contaminating the work area.