Spray Guard Flapping Reduction via Sliding Skid

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hand-held work apparatuses, such as edge cutters and furrow cutters, face issues with mechanical loading and reduced service life due to flapping spray guards, which increase the effort required to operate them and lead to wear on the cutting head.

Innovation Solution

A work apparatus design featuring a protective hood with a sliding skid and a flexible spray guard attached at the front, where the spray guard's rear section is free to move and contacts the skid, preventing flapping and reducing mechanical loading, along with a guide surface to direct excavated material laterally, ensuring effective spray protection and easy operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the spray guard is made flexible to allow movement, then the spray guard can adapt to operating conditions, but the spray guard flaps downward during operation causing high mechanical loading and increased effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray guard movement capabilityVSAvoidmechanical loading on spray guard
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

A contact surface is introduced as an intermediary element between the spray guard and the environment. This contact surface guides the spray guard's movement, allowing it to adapt to operating conditions while preventing uncontrolled flapping that would cause high mechanical loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The spray guard's orientation is controlled by changing the geometric parameters of the contact surface. By designing the contact surface with specific angles and orientations, the spray guard is guided to maintain optimal positioning during operation, reducing mechanical stress while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the spray guard is constrained to prevent flapping, then mechanical loading is reduced, but the spray guard loses its ability to adapt to operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical loading on spray guardVSAvoidspray guard movement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The spray guard is designed with dynamic characteristics, allowing it to move and adapt during operation. The contact surface provides guidance rather than rigid constraint, enabling the spray guard to respond to changing operating conditions while maintaining controlled movement that prevents excessive mechanical loading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the spray guard extends far rearward for effective protection, then spray coverage is improved, but the spray guard becomes more prone to flapping and mechanical damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray protection effectivenessVSAvoidspray guard service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The contact surface acts as a mediator that supports the extended rearward portion of the spray guard. This allows the spray guard to extend far enough for effective protection while the contact surface prevents it from flapping freely, thereby maintaining reliability and service life despite the extended reach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Strength

If a rigid spray guard is used instead of flexible, then structural strength is improved, but the spray guard cannot adapt to operating conditions and may cause increased effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray guard structural strengthVSAvoidoperator effort required
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The spray guard exhibits local quality variations: the attachment section is fixed for structural strength, while the protective section is flexible for adaptability. The contact surface further refines this by providing localized support to the rearward portion, allowing different sections to fulfill different functions optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9095098B2Work apparatus
Publication Date: 2015.08.04 ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO KG
  • US9095098B2 patent drawing
  • US9095098B2 patent drawing
  • US9095098B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A handheld work apparatus such as a bed redefiner or edger has a handle for guiding the work apparatus over the ground. The apparatus also includes a drive motor which drives a tool in rotation. During operation, the apparatus is moved over the ground by the operator in a direction of movement. The tool is covered at least partially by a protective hood and a sliding skid is arranged on that end of the protective hood located at the front in the direction of movement. The sliding skid has an abutment surface for a flexible spray guard fixed to the protective hood. The spray guard is fastened to the protective hood in its fastening region located at the front viewed in the direction of movement. The spray guard is movable in its protective region located at the rear viewed in the direction of movement.