Spray Gun Pressure Feedback for Stable Impingement Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Impingement mixing systems, such as Spray Polyurethane Foam systems, face inefficiencies due to unknown and unequal pressures of fluid streams at the spray gun, leading to poor mixing, irregular deposition patterns, and potential system occlusion, as well as temperature imbalances affecting reaction rates and foam quality.

Innovation Solution

The system employs independent pressure and temperature sensing and control at the spray gun, using sensors to transmit signals to a proportioning unit for precise adjustment of pump actuators and heating systems, ensuring equal pressures and optimized momentum of fluid streams, and independent temperature control to achieve desired reaction rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If independent pressure sensing and control is implemented at the spray gun, then mixing efficiency and foam quality are improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides pressure control into independent segments for each fluid stream (Component A and Component B), with separate pressure sensors and control loops. This segmentation allows precise control of each stream's pressure independently, ensuring optimal mixing ratios and preventing cross-contamination, while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control where pressure sensors continuously monitor the pressure of each fluid stream at the spray gun, and the controller automatically adjusts pump speeds or valve positions to maintain target pressures. This feedback mechanism ensures consistent mixing efficiency and foam quality while compensating for variations in viscosity, temperature, or flow conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If pressure equalization is achieved between fluid streams, then deposition uniformity is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition uniformityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system equalizes the pressure potential of both fluid streams at the spray gun by using pressure sensors on each stream and controlling them to maintain equal pressures. This equipotential approach ensures that both components arrive at the mixing chamber simultaneously and with equal force, producing uniform deposition patterns and consistent foam quality without requiring complex differential pressure control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Productivity

If momentum of fluid streams is optimized, then impingement mixing efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes fluid stream momentum by dynamically adjusting pressure and flow rate parameters based on real-time sensor feedback. The controller modifies pump speeds or valve openings to achieve the optimal momentum balance between Component A and Component B streams, maximizing impingement mixing efficiency while minimizing energy consumption by avoiding excessive pressure differentials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the control of impingement mixing, reducing pressure imbalances, enhancing foam quality, minimizing downtime due to occlusion, and ensuring consistent deposition patterns by maintaining optimal reaction rates and fluid properties at the spray gun.

Implementation Method 1

independent pressure sensing and control at the spray gun, using sensors to transmit signals to a proportioning unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

independent temperature control to achieve desired reaction rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature sensing:

Implementation Method 3

precise adjustment of pump actuators and heating systems, ensuring equal pressures and optimized momentum of fluid streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 4

independent temperature control to achieve desired reaction rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 5

Impingement mixing relies on the inertia of two or more streams of reactive fluids to initiate a chemical reaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11022987B2Systems and methods for improved control of impingement mixing
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 CARLISLE FLUID TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11022987B2 patent drawing
  • US11022987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid delivery system includes a first pressure sensor disposed on or near a spray gun and configured to monitor a first fluid, and a second pressure sensor disposed on or near the spray gun and configured to monitor a second fluid. The fluid delivery system further includes control system comprising a processor configured to receive a first signal from the first pressure sensor and to receive a second signal from the second pressure sensor. The processor is further configured to derive a pressure difference between the first and the second pressure sensor representative of a fluid pressure difference between the first fluid and the second fluid and to control one or more pumps to obtain a desired pressure difference.