Agricultural Spray System Nozzle Calibration for Foliage Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural spray systems often result in wasted chemical products due to inefficient distribution, with existing systems struggling to accurately apply the right amount of fertilizers and pesticides to dense plant foliage, leading to high costs and potential overuse restrictions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a spray system equipped with LIDAR, RADAR, or other sensors to create a three-dimensional representation of plants, allowing for precise control of nozzles through pulse-width modulation and dynamic adjustment of nozzle sizes and traverse speed based on real-time foliage density, ensuring targeted application and minimizing overspray.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If spray systems use fixed nozzle orientations and continuous spraying, then material application is simplified, but material waste increases and coverage precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical product wasteVSAvoidspray control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spray system dynamically adjusts nozzle activation and traverse speed based on real-time foliage detection. The controller receives signals from foliage sensors and dynamically modifies which nozzles are active and at what speed the system traverses, transforming a static spray system into an adaptive one that responds to varying plant density and geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic sensing and control cycles where foliage is detected, processed, and triggers corresponding spray actions. The traverse speed is adjusted in periodic intervals based on foliage density measurements, creating a rhythm of detection-spray-adjust that optimizes material delivery while minimizing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If spray systems increase traverse speed to improve productivity, then output increases, but spray coverage and application precision decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespray application speedVSAvoidspray coverage precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The traverse speed is dynamically adjusted based on real-time foliage density measurements. When dense foliage is detected, the system automatically reduces traverse speed to ensure adequate spray coverage and material delivery. When foliage is sparse, the system increases speed to maintain productivity. This dynamic speed control resolves the contradiction between productivity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where foliage sensors continuously monitor plant density and geometry, the controller processes this information, and adjusts traverse speed accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that spray application precision is maintained across varying field conditions while optimizing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If spray systems use larger nozzle sizes to increase material delivery, then coverage improves, but system adaptability to different foliage densities decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial delivery rateVSAvoidnozzle configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The spray system divides the spray function into multiple independent nozzles rather than using a single large nozzle. Each nozzle can be independently controlled and activated based on local foliage density requirements. This segmentation allows the system to deliver adequate material quantity to dense areas while maintaining adaptability to vary coverage in less dense areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different nozzles are assigned to different spatial zones and can be selectively activated based on local foliage conditions. The system applies material with appropriate quantity and intensity at each location rather than uniform application, achieving both adequate material delivery where needed and adaptability to varying densities across the spray zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise delivery of chemicals directly to plant areas, reducing waste and optimizing chemical usage, thereby minimizing costs and adhering to environmental regulations while ensuring effective application.

Implementation Method 1

An automated spray system may use LIDAR, RADAR, or other sensors to measure a plant prior to spraying the plant with a chemical product.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

An automated spray system may use LIDAR, RADAR, or other sensors to measure a plant prior to spraying the plant with a chemical product.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRADAR: Radar

Data Source

PatentEP4466993A1Spray system with calibration
Publication Date: 2024.11.27 SMART APPLY INC
  • EP4466993A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4466993A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4466993A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An agricultural spray system may have several nozzles oriented in an airstream. A controller may sense the presence or absence of foliage over many points, then determine which nozzle to activate and for how long. Each nozzle may spray in a fixed direction, and therefore may be assigned a zone for application. A real time calculation may be made to apply product through the nozzle based on the amount of foliage in a nozzle's zone at that instant. In some cases, the amount of material demanded for a nozzle may be higher than that nozzle can deliver, leading to a situation where the demanded duty cycle may be higher than 100% for that nozzle at that time. After passing through a particular field, the duty cycle of the nozzles over the field may be analyzed, and from that analysis, recommended changes to the nozzle sizes, traverse speed, or other factors may be made to increase the coverage and spray efficiency of the spray system.