Automated Specimen Deposition via Spray Atomization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for preparing biological samples on slides are highly variable, leading to challenges in screening and diagnosis, and often require additional samples from patients.

Innovation Solution

The development of automated specimen deposition systems that use spray deposition technology to achieve high-quality, low-variability specimen-bearing substrates, preserving natural cell molecular and structural characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional manual or automated liquid-based systems are used for specimen deposition, then the process can be completed with existing equipment, but the deposition quality is highly variable and requires additional samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecimen deposition qualityVSAvoiddiagnostic consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional liquid-based mechanical transfer methods with spray deposition technology. The spray system uses a nozzle to atomize and deposit specimens in a controlled aerosol pattern, eliminating the variability inherent in manual liquid transfer and filtration methods. This mechanical substitution achieves consistent monolayer deposition with high precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention controls deposition parameters including spray pressure, nozzle-to-slide distance, specimen flow rate, and aerosolization conditions to optimize deposition quality. By precisely adjusting these parameters, the system achieves consistent monolayer formation and eliminates the quality variability observed in conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual smearing or liquid transfer methods are used, then the equipment complexity is low, but the technician assistance required increases and quality variability persists

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnician assistance requiredVSAvoidspecimen deposition consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The automated spray deposition system performs specimen deposition without requiring skilled technician intervention. The system automatically controls spray parameters, nozzle positioning, and deposition timing, making the process self-regulating and eliminating the need for manual smearing or liquid transfer operations that require technical expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the critical deposition control functions from manual technician operations and transfers them to automated electronic control systems. This separation allows the system to maintain high precision while reducing the skill level and assistance required from operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If conventional deposition methods are used, then the process is simple to implement, but the cell structural characteristics may be distorted or deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcell molecular and structural characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The spray deposition system uses periodic aerosol pulses to deposit specimens, allowing controlled interaction time between the specimen aerosol and the slide surface. This periodic action prevents excessive mechanical stress on cells while ensuring complete deposition, preserving cell structural integrity better than continuous liquid contact methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes phase transition from liquid specimen to aerosol particles during spray deposition. This phase change allows gentle handling of specimens in suspended droplets that minimize mechanical distortion, followed by controlled deposition as the aerosol contacts the slide surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These systems produce consistent and accurate measurements and diagnostic outcomes with minimal technician assistance, reducing quality variability and increasing diagnostic reliability.

Implementation Method 1

achieve spray deposition of biological samples

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerosol: Aerosol

Implementation Method 2

spray deposition technology to achieve high-quality, low-variability specimen-bearing substrates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpray: Spray

Data Source

PatentUS20250172578A1Automated specimen deposition systems and associated methods
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 NANOCYTOMICS LLC
  • US20250172578A1 patent drawing
  • US20250172578A1 patent drawing
  • US20250172578A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that enable automated spray deposition of biological specimens carried on microscope slides are described herein. Aspects of the technology are directed, for example, to automated specimen deposition systems and methods of generating high-quality, reproducible specimen-bearing microscope slides in automated processing systems.