Sprayer Camera Visualization for Precision Weed and Crop Targeting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural sprayers face inefficiencies in substance application, leading to over-spraying or under-spraying due to the lack of precise targeting of crops and weeds, resulting in increased costs and potential environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

An agricultural machine equipped with an imaging system that captures images of the field, processes them to identify crop and weed locations, and controls actuatable applicator mechanisms to apply substances precisely based on determined characteristics, generating a user interface for visualization and control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional spraying methods are used without precise targeting, then the spraying operation is simple and fast, but substance application precision deteriorates leading to over-spraying or under-spraying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstance application precisionVSAvoidspraying system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spraying system is segmented into multiple independently controllable actuatable applicator mechanisms (nozzles) that can be individually controlled based on image data from different regions of the field. This allows precise targeting of specific plants while leaving other areas untreated, resolving the contradiction between application precision and system complexity by dividing the control function into discrete, manageable units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by capturing images of the agricultural surface before spraying and processing them to identify plant characteristics and locations. This advance preparation allows the control system to pre-determine which areas require spraying and at what rates, enabling precise substance application when the actual spraying occurs without requiring complex real-time decision-making during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of substance

If traditional broadcast spraying is used, then the spraying operation is simple and quick, but substance quantity increases leading to waste and increased costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstance wasteVSAvoidplant matter characteristic detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical broadcast spraying approach with an imaging and control system that uses optical sensors to detect plant characteristics and a computer control system to regulate substance application. This substitution enables precise measurement of plant properties (such as species, size, health status) and translates these measurements into controlled substance application rates, minimizing waste while ensuring adequate treatment of target plants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously capturing images of the agricultural surface, processing the image data to determine plant characteristics, and using this information to adjust substance application in real-time. The control system monitors the spraying process and makes adjustments based on actual plant conditions observed in the image data, ensuring optimal substance distribution and minimizing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If precise image-based control is implemented, then substance application precision improves, but device complexity and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying efficiencyVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically capturing images, processing image data to identify plant characteristics, determining optimal substance application rates, and controlling the actuatable applicator mechanisms without requiring constant human intervention. The control system autonomously makes decisions about which plants to treat and at what rates, significantly improving spraying efficiency while reducing the operational burden on the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with multi-functionality, serving as both the image processing unit, the decision-making algorithm executor, and the spraying mechanism controller. This universal system handles multiple functions that could otherwise require separate devices or manual operations, improving overall productivity while maintaining relatively simple operation through a unified control interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11998000B2Camera system visualization and control for an agricultural spraying machine
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 DEERE & CO
  • US11998000B2 patent drawing
  • US11998000B2 patent drawing
  • US11998000B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural machine includes a product application system comprising a plurality of actuatable applicator mechanisms, each actuatable applicator mechanism configured to apply a substance on an agricultural surface, an imaging system configured to obtain image data indicative of an image of plant matter on the agricultural surface, and a control system configured to determine a characteristic of the plant matter in an image region defined within the image, control one or more of the actuatable applicator mechanisms to apply the substance on the agricultural surface based on the determined characteristic, and generate a user interface display that displays the image and includes a display element that visually represents the image region within the image.