Spreader Bar Connection Angles and Impact Faces
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Spreader bars used in lifting dragline buckets are prone to damage when dropped, and the increasing size of buckets puts greater loads on these bars, leading to significant downtime and production losses due to frequent failures.
Innovation Solution
The design of spreader bars with strategically positioned connection points for hoist chains, angled to create a larger enclosed angle with the longitudinal axis, and end portions with flat lower faces to distribute impact loads, allowing for a lighter construction that engages the bucket's upper edges upon falling, thereby reducing damage and accommodating increased loads without weight increase.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If spreader bar length is increased to accommodate larger bucket widths, then the spreader bar can handle larger buckets, but the spreader bar weight increases proportionately
Solution Approach 1:
The spreader bar is divided into multiple segments: end portions with connection points, intermediate portions connecting them, and flat lower faces at strategic locations. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently for strength and weight, enabling the bar to handle larger buckets without proportionally increasing overall weight.
Solution Approach 2:
Different portions of the spreader bar have different structural properties - end portions have connection points for chain attachment, intermediate portions have specific geometries for load distribution, and flat lower faces provide impact surfaces. This local differentiation allows the structure to be as light as possible while maintaining necessary strength where required.
2Strength
If spreader bar connection points are positioned to create larger enclosed angles with the longitudinal axis, then the structural efficiency is improved, but the connection point spacing requires precise control
Solution Approach 1:
The invention specifies that connection points be positioned to create enclosed angles with the longitudinal axis within the range of 45 to 90 degrees. This parameter specification optimizes the structural efficiency of the spreader bar while providing a practical design guideline that balances strength requirements with manufacturing feasibility.
3Productivity
If spreader bar is made lighter to reduce downtime and production losses, then the productivity improves, but the spreader bar may be more susceptible to damage when dropped
Solution Approach 1:
Flat lower faces are provided on the spreader bar at locations where impact with the bucket upper edge is most likely to occur. These flat surfaces act as predetermined impact zones that distribute drop forces across a larger area, protecting the lighter bar structure from concentrated impact damage and reducing the risk of failure.
Solution Approach 2:
The invention converts the harmful impact of drops onto the bucket edge into a beneficial force distribution mechanism. By designing flat lower faces at strategic locations, the harmful concentrated impact force is transformed into a distributed load across the flat surface, allowing the lighter spreader bar to withstand drops without proportional increases in weight.
Data Source
AI summary
A spreader bar including two spaced apart opposite end portions, each end portion having a first connection point for connecting a lower hoist chain thereto and a second connection point for connecting an upper hoist chain thereto, said second connection point being spaced from said first connection point towards the opposite end portion by a first predetermined distance, said predetermined distance being selected such that in use an upper hoist chain connected thereto makes a smaller angle with the longitudinal axis of the spreader bar than would an upper hoist chain connected to the first connection point.


