Spreader Cover Actuation via Electromechanical Gear Drive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing distribution machines face challenges with moisture-induced caking of powdery materials, difficult manual operation of covers, and high maintenance costs due to hydraulic or electric actuators, which compromise dosing accuracy and container integrity, especially under adverse weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

A distribution machine with a cover actuated by an electromotive drive unit featuring a gear arrangement downstream of the electric motor, eliminating the need for hydraulic or electric cylinders, and allowing for compact, low-maintenance, and safe operation, including a detachable driver for manual operation in case of failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If hydraulic or electric actuators are used to actuate the cover, then the cover can be automated, but maintenance costs increase and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover actuation automationVSAvoidactuator reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex hydraulic or electric actuators with a simple electric motor coupled directly to the cover pivot axis through a gear mechanism. This substitution eliminates the need for hydraulic lines, complex electric cylinders, or pneumatic systems, thereby reducing maintenance requirements and improving reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the intermediate transmission components (hydraulic cylinders, electric cylinders, or pneumatic actuators) that mediate between the power source and the cover. By coupling the electric motor directly to the cover axis through a simple gear, the system removes the problematic intermediate stages that require maintenance and reduce reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Device complexity

If manual operation of the cover is used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates and user safety decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation system complexityVSAvoidcover operation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated self-service for cover actuation through a simple electric motor control system. The motor automatically opens or closes the cover based on control signals, eliminating the need for manual physical effort while maintaining simple overall system design. The detachment mechanism allows the system to revert to manual operation if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If the cover is manually operated, then device complexity is reduced, but the risk of user injury increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation system complexityVSAvoiduser injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operation with an automated electric motor system that controls cover movement. This substitution eliminates the risk of pinching or injuring users' hands and limbs during cover operation, while the simple gear mechanism keeps overall device complexity low. The motor provides controlled, predictable movement that can be stopped or reversed if obstacles are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Extent of automation

If hydraulic actuators are used for cover actuation, then automation is achieved, but maintenance costs and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover actuation automationVSAvoidactuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex hydraulic transmission system from the cover actuation mechanism. Instead of using hydraulic cylinders with lines, valves, and pumps, the system uses a direct electric motor-to-gear-to-cover-axis connection, dramatically simplifying the actuation system while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the hydraulic mechanical system with an electric motor system. This replacement eliminates hydraulic fluid, seals, lines, and complex mechanical linkages, resulting in a simpler, more maintainable automated actuation system that directly drives the cover pivot axis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Extent of automation

If electric cylinders are used for cover actuation, then automation is achieved, but maintenance requirements and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover actuation automationVSAvoidactuation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the electric cylinder component from the actuation system. Instead of using an electric cylinder with its motor, gear train, and mechanical linkages, the system uses a simplified electric motor directly coupled to a gear that drives the cover axis, reducing complexity while maintaining automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the electric cylinder mechanism with a simpler electric motor-and-gear arrangement. This replacement removes the intermediate mechanical transmission stages of the electric cylinder, resulting in a more direct, simpler, and equally effective automated actuation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a robust, reliable, and cost-effective cover actuation system that maintains container integrity and ensures precise dosing, even in adverse conditions, with reduced risk of user injury and contamination, while allowing for easy retrofitting of manually operated covers.

Implementation Method 1

an electromotive drive unit with at least one gear arranged downstream of its electric motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP2868182B1Spreader machine with a container and a pivoting cover associated to this container
Publication Date: 2018.05.09 RAUCH LANDMASCHINENFABRIK GMBH
  • EP2868182B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2868182B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP2868182B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A distribution machine, particularly in the form of a spreader or seed drill, is proposed, comprising a container (2) supported by a frame for receiving powdered or particulate material, a discharge opening located at the bottom of the container (2), a metering element downstream of the discharge opening, and a distribution element downstream of the metering element for distributing the powdered or particulate material on the ground. The container (2) has an electrically operated cover (3) that can be opened and closed about a pivot axis (A), which, in its closed position, covers the opening cross-section of the container (2) and, in its open position, exposes at least part of the opening cross-section of the container (2).The invention provides that the cover (3) is actuated by an electromechanical drive unit (6) fixed to the container (2) or to its support frame, which has an output shaft (8) on which a driver (9) is non-rotatably mounted, which is connected to or formed by a pivotable support (3a) of the cover (3).