Spring-Biased Tag Arms for Automated Elastic Loop Application

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional devices for applying items with flexible loops, such as coupons, to products on a production line are labor-intensive and inefficient due to the need for manual operation and difficulty in accurately placing the correct number and type of items at a rapid pace.

Innovation Solution

A tag applicator with a linear actuator and pivotably connected tag arms, biased by a spring, uses separator rollers to separate the arms and extend the elastic loop, allowing for automated application of tags from a bandolier to products moving on a conveyor belt.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation is used to place items on products, then placement accuracy is maintained, but productivity is reduced and labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tag applicator is designed to automatically perform the tagging operation without human intervention. The system self-regulates through the spring-biased arms that automatically engage and disengage tags from the bandolier and apply them to products moving on the conveyor belt, eliminating the need for manual placement while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical system with an automated mechanical system. The spring-biased tag arms provide automatic mechanical action to separate, hold, and apply tags, substituting human manual operation with a self-actuating mechanical mechanism that increases throughput while reducing labor intensity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated tag application is implemented, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidmechanical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tag applicator is divided into distinct functional segments: the spring-biased tag arms for tag engagement and separation, the linear actuator for controlled movement, and the tag release mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, simplifying the overall system design while enabling automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic spring-biased arms that automatically adjust their position and force application based on the tag material properties and conveyor speed. The spring mechanism provides adaptive mechanical action that simplifies control compared to rigid fixed-position systems, enabling automated operation with minimal complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If spring-biased tag arms are used, then tag separation accuracy is improved, but force requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag placement accuracyVSAvoidspring force
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The spring force parameter is optimized to provide sufficient separation force for accurate tag placement while remaining within reasonable limits. The spring constant and pre-load are carefully selected to match the tag material properties and desired separation distance, achieving accurate tag placement without excessive force requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables efficient and accurate automated application of tags to products, improving throughput and reducing labor intensity by using a mechanical system to separate and attach the tags to products as they move along the production line.

Implementation Method 1

The two arms are biased toward each other, such as by a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a tag, having an elastic loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10793309B2Flexible loop applicator and method
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 NORTHFIELD CORP
  • US10793309B2 patent drawing
  • US10793309B2 patent drawing
  • US10793309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tag applicator, and a method, for applying a tag, having an elastic loop, to a product. The tag applicator includes a linear actuator, and a pair of tag arms, one end of each being pivotably connected to the linear actuator. The two arms are biased toward each other, such as by a spring. A separator is positioned between the tag arms, so as to force the tag arms to separate as the linear actuator extends. A finger or tag hook is connected at the end of each tag arm, configured and positioned to connect to or insert into the elastic loop, and to extend the elastic loop as the tag arms are separated. With the tag loop held open, the product moves into the loop, and the tag is thereby applied to the product.