Spring-Biased Tissue Retractor with Asymmetric Blades for Spinal Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Minimally invasive surgical techniques for spinal surgery face challenges in safely retracting patient tissue to expose the operative field, particularly due to the presence of nerve roots, which can be damaged during the process, and existing retractor devices lack the necessary precision and control.

Innovation Solution

A tissue retractor device with spring-biased blades that can be rotated and angularly displaced using a pusher mechanism, featuring a longer blade for precise maneuvering around nerve roots, and a dilator mechanism for initial penetration, allowing controlled tissue retraction and expansion of the operative field.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If traditional open surgical procedures are used to expose the operative field, then sufficient space is provided for surgical procedures, but extensive operating time and post-operative recovery time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperative field exposure areaVSAvoidoperating time and recovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor device is segmented into multiple independently controllable blades that can be adjusted separately. Each blade can be individually positioned to create the necessary operative field exposure, allowing for minimally invasive access while maintaining sufficient surgical space. This segmentation enables precise control without requiring extensive tissue dissection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If tissue is retracted to provide surgical space, then the operative field is exposed, but nerve roots may be damaged or severed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperative field exposure areaVSAvoidnerve root damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor blades are designed to be dynamically adjustable during the surgical procedure. The surgeon can rotate and reposition each blade independently to navigate around nerve roots and critical structures. This dynamic control allows the operative field to be exposed while continuously adapting to protect vulnerable anatomical structures from damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the retractor device have different properties - the blades are tapered with varying lengths and curvatures to match the specific anatomical requirements. The longer blade with different curvature is positioned to provide additional clearance in areas with critical structures, while shorter blades are used where less space is needed, creating localized protection zones around nerve roots.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If a retractor device with multiple blades is used to expand the operative field, then tissue retraction is achieved, but control and precision are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperative field exposure areaVSAvoidcontrol and precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor is divided into multiple blades that can be independently controlled through individual rotation mechanisms. Each blade can be adjusted separately to achieve precise positioning, allowing the surgeon to maintain fine control over tissue retraction while expanding the operative field. This segmented control system enhances rather than reduces operational precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blades are designed with asymmetric properties - one blade is longer than the others and has different curvature characteristics. This asymmetry provides a reference orientation and allows the surgeon to intuitively understand the device orientation and blade positions, improving control and precision during operation rather than reducing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Measurement precision

If the device tip is made smaller to maneuver around nerve roots, then precision is improved, but device strength and stability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuvering precision around nerve rootsVSAvoiddevice strength and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the functions of navigation and retraction into different components. The dilator with its smaller tip is used for initial navigation and positioning with precision, while the larger blade structure is deployed afterward to provide the necessary strength and stability for tissue retraction. This segmentation allows both precision maneuvering and structural strength to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dilator is used in a preliminary action to create the initial pathway and position the device accurately around nerve roots before the main retractor blades are deployed. This preliminary positioning ensures precision in navigating critical structures, while the subsequent deployment of the full blade structure provides the necessary strength and stability for the surgical procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides greater control, precision, and ease of use, reducing the risk of nerve damage and improving surgical outcomes by safely expanding the operative field, applicable not only to spinal surgery but also in other surgical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

each of the blades is spring-biased so that the blades close upon themselves in the default state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mechanism: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the pusher interacts with the blades in a manner to controllably and angularly displace each of the blades from its respective closed position about its respective hinge, responsive to the surgeon's manually-rotating the pusher in the threaded connection relative to the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreaded connection: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS9113854B2Tissue retractor
Publication Date: 2015.08.25 ELLIQUENCE LLC
  • US9113854B2 patent drawing
  • US9113854B2 patent drawing
  • US9113854B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tissue retractor device suitable for spinal surgery. The device includes base apparatus to which three blades are circumferentially hinged, the blades closing upon each other in default position from spring bias. A pusher mechanism is threadably connected to the base which spreads the blades by rotating the pusher in its threads relative to the base, which converts rotational motion to translational motion to angular motion of the blades about their respective hinges. One blade is longer than the others to present a multipurpose tip to the user of the device, such a tip being useful in avoiding nerve roots or other anatomy obstructing the surgical path. A dilator is threadably connected to the pusher, the dilator having a long hollow tube connected to a hollow tip extending beyond the blades to slide over guide-wire and initially position the device at the operative site, prior to using the pusher to retract patient's tissue.