Spring End Grinding Machine Sealed Oscillating Drive

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grinding machines for springs face premature failure of bearings and drive mechanisms due to exposure to a hostile grinding environment, and are cumbersome and time-consuming to switch between different spring sizes and eccentricities.

Innovation Solution

A grinding machine with a fixed spring mounting in a closed environment and a grinding surface that oscillates laterally or diagonally across the spring end, using a stable support structure and a common prime mover for both grinding and oscillation drives, with a seal to contain debris and a carousel for simultaneous grinding of both ends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a reciprocating mounting mechanism is used to create relative movement between the spring and grinding surface, then the grinding process can be performed, but the bearings and drive mechanisms are exposed to a hostile grinding environment causing premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent longevityVSAvoidexposure to grinding debris
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful grinding environment (debris, dust, coolant) is extracted and isolated from the mounting mechanism by introducing a sealed enclosure. The mounting mechanism operates in a clean, protected environment while the grinding occurs in an isolated zone, preventing contamination of bearings and drive mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A sealed enclosure acts as an intermediary barrier between the grinding zone and the mounting mechanism. This enclosure allows the transmission of mechanical motion while preventing the passage of harmful particles, thus protecting the mounting mechanism from the hostile grinding environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a complex reciprocating mounting mechanism is used to accommodate different spring sizes and eccentricities, then versatility is achieved, but the mechanism becomes cumbersome and time-consuming to switch between configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of different spring sizesVSAvoidtime to switch configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting mechanism incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that can be dynamically modified to accommodate different spring sizes and eccentricities. Quick-adjust features allow operators to change configurations rapidly without complex reassembly, reducing setup time while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting mechanism is divided into modular, independently adjustable segments that can be quickly reconfigured for different spring types. This segmentation allows for rapid adjustment of positioning and clamping elements without affecting the entire mechanism, enabling fast switching between spring sizes and eccentricities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If a large diameter grinding wheel with significant mass is used, then the grinding surface can be maintained, but the grinding wheel is cumbersome and rotates at high speed requiring complex mounting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding surface stabilityVSAvoidmounting mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single large-diameter grinding wheel, the invention employs multiple smaller grinding surfaces or wheels that replicate the grinding function. These smaller surfaces can be mounted on simpler, lighter mechanisms while maintaining effective grinding contact, reducing the complexity and mass requirements of the mounting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The grinding function is distributed across multiple smaller surfaces arranged in a different spatial configuration rather than relying on one large wheel. This dimensional redistribution allows for simpler mounting mechanisms while achieving the same grinding stability through coordinated action of multiple smaller elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces wear on components, maintains consistent contact for efficient grinding, and allows for quick switching between spring sizes and configurations, enhancing the longevity and efficiency of the grinding process.

Implementation Method 1

a grinding surface secured to a support structure and arranged upon parts of the support structure to relatively oscillate to and fro along a guided oscillation path or cycle across one end of the spring mounting with the grinding surface such that there is continuous contact in use with at least one end of one spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP2670565B1Grinding machine for the grinding of spring ends
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 BENNETT MAHLER
  • EP2670565B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2670565B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5(b)
  • EP2670565B1 patent drawingFigure 6(a)~6(f)

AI summary

A grinding machine for grinding an end of a spring, the machine comprising a fixed spring mounting, which is fixable in a known position in the machine, for a spring or springs and a grinding surface secured to a support structure and arranged with the support structure to relatively oscillate to and fro along an oscillation path or cycle across one end of the mounting.