Spring-Actuated Impact Trolley Testing for Free Collision Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing impact test methods are inefficient in terms of load and bracing, the technical issues such as limited solution generating capability, ability to test uniform specimens, lack of data collection, unsuitability for free collision scenarios, and limitations on weight-velocity-collision surface geometry and stiffness.

Innovation Solution

A spring-actuated universal impact test device that facilitates easy specimen assembly, allows adjustable impact weight, changeable impact contact surface, and enables free collision without gravity effects, with integrated sensors for data collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional impact test methods (pendulum, weight drop, compressed air, hydraulic actuator) are used, then impact testing can be performed, but the device complexity increases and adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal impact test device that can perform multiple impact testing methods (pendulum, weight drop, compressed air, hydraulic actuator, spring-loaded) through a single integrated system. The device features interchangeable components and adjustable parameters that allow it to adapt to different testing requirements without requiring separate specialized equipment for each method, thereby achieving multi-functionality and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If traditional impact test methods are used, then basic impact testing is possible, but the ability to collect comprehensive data (load-time, acceleration-time, velocity) is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces sensors as intermediary devices that mediate between the impact testing process and data collection. These sensors (load cells, accelerometers, velocity sensors) act as intermediaries that capture various parameters during impact events and transmit this information to a data processing system, enabling comprehensive data collection without fundamentally altering the core impact testing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical measurement methods with electronic sensing and digital data processing systems. Instead of relying solely on mechanical indicators or manual measurements, the system uses electronic sensors to detect and record load, acceleration, and velocity parameters, substituting mechanical measurement systems with more sophisticated electronic instrumentation for enhanced data collection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If fixed configuration impact test devices are used, then structural stability is maintained, but ease of reconfiguration and relocation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of reconfigurationVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the impact test device into modular, separable components that can be independently configured and repositioned. The system includes detachable mounting structures, interchangeable testing fixtures, and separable sensor arrays that allow users to reconfigure the device for different testing scenarios or relocate it without compromising the overall structural integrity when properly assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements into the device structure, allowing it to transition between different configurations dynamically. The mounting system and fixture arrangements are designed to be easily adjusted during operation or between tests, enabling the device to adapt to various testing requirements while maintaining stability during each specific test configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables predictable and versatile impact testing across different materials, providing comprehensive data on load, acceleration, and velocity, and allowing easy reconfiguration and relocation.

Implementation Method 1

a spring-loaded launching system (2), which provides a launching task in the test device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

at least one bearing (4.1) which, by pressing, forces the release hook (3.2) to rotate around an attachment point so as to release the hook holding knob (1.2)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250383276A1Spring-actuated universal impact test device
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 ISTANBUL TEKNIK UNIVSI
  • US20250383276A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383276A1 patent drawing
  • US20250383276A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The provided is a test device for testing the horizontal impact effects of various materials such as ceramics, metals, plastics, composites or various elements made of these materials. The test device includes an impact trolley, a spring-loaded launching system, a hook and spring tensioning system, a spring tensioning distance adjustment and unhooking system, an impact absorber system, derailment barriers, a specimen main mounting frame, and an anti-kickback apparatus.