Sheet product dispensers and related methods for reducing sheet product usage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional sheet product dispensers either provide insufficient resistance, leading to excessive rotation and waste, or inconsistent resistance that varies over the life of the roll, resulting in an undesirable user experience and increased costs due to unnecessary sheet product usage.

Innovation Solution

A sheet product dispenser with a roll support mechanism and a resistance mechanism that provides a consistent pull force resistance between 36 grams-force and 96 grams-force throughout the majority of the roll's life, ensuring controlled unwinding and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If significant resistance is provided to prevent free-wheeling and over-rotation of the roll, then sheet product waste is reduced, but the resistance becomes intermittent and varies significantly during use, resulting in user frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet product wasteVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance mechanism uses a spring-loaded arm that dynamically adjusts its engagement with the roll to provide substantially constant pull force resistance. The spring allows the resistance to adapt as the roll diameter changes during use, maintaining consistent operational characteristics throughout the roll's life while preventing over-rotation and sheet product waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the resistance mechanism, specifically using a spring with calibrated force characteristics to provide substantially constant pull force resistance. This parameter optimization ensures the resistance remains within a specific range (36-96 grams-force) throughout the roll's life, resolving the contradiction between waste reduction and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If significant resistance is provided to reduce over-rotation, then sheet product usage is controlled, but the resistance varies significantly over the life of the roll, causing inconsistent user feel and perception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet product usageVSAvoidresistance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The spring-loaded resistance mechanism dynamically compensates for changes in roll diameter during use. As the roll becomes smaller, the spring adjusts to maintain substantially constant pull force resistance, ensuring consistent user experience and stable operational characteristics throughout the entire life of the roll while controlling sheet product usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resistance mechanism incorporates a feedback loop where the spring continuously adjusts its engagement force based on the roll's current state. This automatic feedback ensures the pull force resistance remains substantially constant (36-96 grams-force) throughout the roll's life, preventing both over-rotation and inconsistent user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If minimal resistance is provided to allow easy dispensing, then user operation is simple, but the roll continues to rotate well beyond the necessary length due to inertia, causing waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing simplicityVSAvoidsheet product waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance mechanism applies preliminary opposing force to the roll's rotation before excessive unwinding occurs. By providing substantial pull force resistance (36-96 grams-force) from the beginning of each dispensing action, the system counteracts the inertial tendency of the roll to continue rotating, thereby preventing over-rotation and sheet product waste while still allowing easy operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The consistent resistance mechanism reduces sheet product usage by 20-30% and provides a consistent user experience by maintaining optimal resistance levels throughout the roll's life, minimizing waste and costs.

Implementation Method 1

The arm is configured to frictionally engage a surface of the roll of sheet product. The spring is attached to the arm and configured to bias the arm into engagement with the surface of the roll of sheet product such that the resistance mechanism provides a pull force resistance opposing a pull force applied by a user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11540675B2Sheet product dispensers and related methods for reducing sheet product usage
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 GPCP IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11540675B2 patent drawing
  • US11540675B2 patent drawing
  • US11540675B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A resistance mechanism for a sheet product dispenser for dispensing a length of sheet product from a roll of sheet product rotatably supported by the sheet product dispenser is provided. The resistance mechanism includes an arm configured to frictionally engage a surface of the roll of sheet product, and a spring attached to the arm and configured to bias the arm into engagement with the surface of the roll of sheet product, such that the resistance mechanism provides a pull force resistance opposing a pull force applied to a tail portion of the roll of sheet product.